1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(97)82299-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal neuropsychological findings from Stony Brook first episode study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of full-scale IQ, which the authors used as a measure of general cognitive function, the decrease in negative symptoms explained the 8% variance of its improvement. Fluctuations in cognitive performance secondary to both positive [25] and negative [12,20] symptom changes have also been reported in other longitudinal studies. In short, psychotic symptoms, although not the cause of cognitive impairment, play a moderate modulating role in cognitive performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the case of full-scale IQ, which the authors used as a measure of general cognitive function, the decrease in negative symptoms explained the 8% variance of its improvement. Fluctuations in cognitive performance secondary to both positive [25] and negative [12,20] symptom changes have also been reported in other longitudinal studies. In short, psychotic symptoms, although not the cause of cognitive impairment, play a moderate modulating role in cognitive performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The difference between these latter assessment dates was significant ( t = 4.0, df = 49, p < 0.01). Owing to the stability of neurocognitive functions in first episode of psychosis [3,24,26] and the relative small difference between the neurocognition–SUMD/PANSS interval compared to the neurocognition–BCIS interval (about 18 days) it is unlikely that this difference was of much significance. Moreover, virtually all patients were tested at least 3 months after admission to PEPP and were relatively stable at the time of insight evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of cognitive symptoms is a better indicator of social and functional outcome than the severity of negative or positive symptoms [14,16,19,24–26,41,39]. Patients who have the most severe cognitive deficits during the first episode of the disease are most likely to later present a chronic and severe form of schizophrenia [6,30,43]. The relationship between cognitive deficits and functional prognosis seems stable [1,10,36] as shown in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies alike [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%