2006
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal prediction of child outcomes from differing measures of parenting in a low-income sample.

Abstract: This study examined predictions from preschool parenting measures to middle childhood cognitive and socioemotional child outcomes to explore whether parenting assessment methodologies that require more time, training, and expense yield better predictions of child outcomes than less intensive methodologies. Mother-child dyads (N = 278) in low-income African American families were assessed when the child was in preschool, using maternal report, the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding prediction of child development from varying methods of assessing parenting constructs in other groups, recent work with a lowincome African American sample (Zaslow, Weinfield, Gallagher, Hair, Ogawa, Egeland, Tabors, & De Temple, 2006) indicates that differing methodologies -parental report, naturalistic observations, and structured observations -all show some ability to predict child outcomes. However, structured laboratory observations, videotaped and rated by trained, reliable coders, showed the greatest and most consistent prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding prediction of child development from varying methods of assessing parenting constructs in other groups, recent work with a lowincome African American sample (Zaslow, Weinfield, Gallagher, Hair, Ogawa, Egeland, Tabors, & De Temple, 2006) indicates that differing methodologies -parental report, naturalistic observations, and structured observations -all show some ability to predict child outcomes. However, structured laboratory observations, videotaped and rated by trained, reliable coders, showed the greatest and most consistent prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To date, the majority of studies of African American parenting have been cross-sectional, although the past decade has witnessed a growing Downloaded by [University of Minnesota Libraries, Twin Cities] at 12:51 14 October 2014 number of noteworthy longitudinal studies (e.g., Burchinal, Follmer, & Bryant, 1996;Bynum & Brody, 2005;Deater-Deckard et al, 1996;Gutman & Eccles, 1999Kilgore, Snyder, & Lentz, 2000;Kim, Brody, & Murry, 2003;Kotchick, Dorsey, & Heller, 2005;Shumow, Vandell, & Posner, 1998;Simons, Simons, Burt, Drummund, Stewart, Brody, et al, 2006;Smetana, 2000;Zaslow et al, 2006). One reason for the relative lack of longitudinal studies on African Americans is the challenge of maintaining the integrity of the original sample over time, which can be exacerbated in the context of a relatively mobile, and often under-resourced African American population.…”
Section: Participant Retentionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, in a recent study, parenting measures during preschool were examined as predictors of children's cognitive and socioemotional outcomes in middle childhood in about 300 low-income, African American mother-child dyads (Zaslow, Weinfield, Gallagher, Hair, Ogawa, Egeland, et al, 2006). Parenting in preschool was assessed using self-report, the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form (HOME; Caldwell & Bradley, 1984), and observational methods.…”
Section: Quantitative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this approach allows for a more standardized assessment of teacher sensitivity and thus a more accurate assessment of differences between teacher-child dyads (cf. Zaslow et al, 2006). Furthermore, it may be noted that children's (maladaptive) behaviors during the dyadic situation might have influenced the sensitivity of the teachers.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%