2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Study of BIM Adoption by Public Construction Clients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…No current tool able to offer complete ability to pre-check for compliance prior to formal submission. While Table 1 lists multiple approaches that offer the ability to check against design time models, none, with the exception of [3], have achieved industry level adoption Specifically, in relation to items 5-7, while academic literature is strongly in favour of BIM adoption, the wider industry has not yet reached a state of where BIM data has achieved primacy in all projects [48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No current tool able to offer complete ability to pre-check for compliance prior to formal submission. While Table 1 lists multiple approaches that offer the ability to check against design time models, none, with the exception of [3], have achieved industry level adoption Specifically, in relation to items 5-7, while academic literature is strongly in favour of BIM adoption, the wider industry has not yet reached a state of where BIM data has achieved primacy in all projects [48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions, the digital twin concept has been applied in the built environment to date primarily to the operation and maintenance phases. Governmental and other public clients have increasingly recognized that the information provided through use of BIM in the procurement process of infrastructure assets has value in that it can provide the cornerstone for information systems for optimal operation of individual assets, of systems of assets, and indeed of systems of systems (Bew, 2016;Gurevich and Sacks, 2020). The procedures for defining requirements and for delivery of asset information using BIM for the purpose of asset and system operation and maintenance are proscribed by ISO 19650 (ISO/DIS 19650, 2018).…”
Section: Digital Twins In the Built Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that have focused on individual factors identified the determinants of BIM adoption as BIM capability (Hong et al, 2019), self-efficacy (Son et al, 2015), subjective attitude (Xu et al, 2014), personal competency (Lee & Yu, 2016), and personal innovativeness . At the organizational level, several factors such as inter-organizational knowledge mobility (Papadonikolaki, 2018), financial resources (Dainty et al, 2017;Ma, Chan, et al, 2020), top management support (Gurevich & Sacks, 2020), as well as the size, culture, and competency of the organization (Juan et al, 2017;Lee & Yu, 2016;Liu et al, 2019), were proved to have a critical impact on BIM adoption. Moreover, several studies explored the usage environment that significantly influences BIM adoption, such as government BIM mandate (Gurevich et al, 2017), coercive and mimetic pressures (Cao et al, 2014), government subsidies (Yuan & Yang, 2020), market demands (Rogers et al, 2015), and external institutional environment (Cao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%