2011
DOI: 10.1093/shm/hkq106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking for Trouble: Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Steve Sturdy has argued that divisions between the two have been overstated by historians. 35 Certainly, such a dichotomy indicates a questionable reliance on rather essentialist concepts of 'science' and 'art' in medicine, when the two were never entirely separate entities anyway-it was perhaps more the case that an imbalance in favour of science was suspected, rather than an outward hostility to scientific surgery itself. Nonetheless, doctors did worry about the loss of artistic flair in the face of scientific medicine, and surgeons did imagine art and science to be two ideal constituents of surgery.…”
Section: The Distinctiveness Of Surgical Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steve Sturdy has argued that divisions between the two have been overstated by historians. 35 Certainly, such a dichotomy indicates a questionable reliance on rather essentialist concepts of 'science' and 'art' in medicine, when the two were never entirely separate entities anyway-it was perhaps more the case that an imbalance in favour of science was suspected, rather than an outward hostility to scientific surgery itself. Nonetheless, doctors did worry about the loss of artistic flair in the face of scientific medicine, and surgeons did imagine art and science to be two ideal constituents of surgery.…”
Section: The Distinctiveness Of Surgical Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aschheim–Zondek reaction was made into a routine diagnostic tool in the period when laboratory testing became ‘deeply embedded in medical culture’ ( Sturdy, 2011, p. 740 ). It may have been ‘unwieldy’ for ‘regular use or mass-production’ ( Leavitt, 2006, p. 322 ), yet it was made practical and efficient, streamlined and scaled-up in Edinburgh and elsewhere.…”
Section: Diagnostic Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex physiology, as a marginal and weakly institutionalised field, is also notable for its many instances of interdisciplinary collaborations and material exchanges: Oudshoorn (1994) and Clarke (1998) . Revisionist historians are generally beginning to challenge the conflict-oriented narrative of the lab-clinic relationship: Hull (2007), Hammerborg (2011), Sturdy (2011) and Wall (2011) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I internasjonal forskningslitteratur er det ofte blitt tatt for gitt at en slik endring i sykehusets diagnostiske praksis medførte store konflikter, ettersom laboratoriet sterkt økte sin betydning mens klinikken mistet sentrale arbeids-og myndighetsområder. Nyere arbeider setter spørsmålstegn ved et slikt narrativ (3,4), og prosessen i Bergen fremviser da heller ikke tegn på konflikt (5). De mange nye teknologiene som ble tilgjengelige i perioden, ble tvert imot innført i sykehuset med entusiasme og i naert samarbeid mellom sykehusets prosektor og to overleger.…”
Section: Sammendragunclassified