Imaging Marine Life 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9783527675418.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking Inside Marine Organisms with Magnetic Resonance and X‐ray Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All CT data were reconstructed using Feldkamp's filtered back-projection algorithm with a cut-off at the Nyquist frequency and an isotropic voxel size of 100 lm. Three-dimensional processing and rendering followed the protocols of Boistel et al (Boistel et al, 2011) and Zanette et al (Zanette et al, 2013) after semiautomatic segmentation of different skeletal units (cranial, 12 first vertebrae and otolith) using 'Convert Image Type', converted into 8-bit voxels to obtain a mask and subsequently having used ImageJ (Abramoff, Magalhaes & Ram, 2014) for masking the anatomical structures we were not interested in, for each skeletal unit. Direct volume rendering was used for visualizing the subset of selected voxels of cranial, otolith and post cranial elements as well as gut content, in 8.0.1 (FEI, VSG, SAS, Merignac, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All CT data were reconstructed using Feldkamp's filtered back-projection algorithm with a cut-off at the Nyquist frequency and an isotropic voxel size of 100 lm. Three-dimensional processing and rendering followed the protocols of Boistel et al (Boistel et al, 2011) and Zanette et al (Zanette et al, 2013) after semiautomatic segmentation of different skeletal units (cranial, 12 first vertebrae and otolith) using 'Convert Image Type', converted into 8-bit voxels to obtain a mask and subsequently having used ImageJ (Abramoff, Magalhaes & Ram, 2014) for masking the anatomical structures we were not interested in, for each skeletal unit. Direct volume rendering was used for visualizing the subset of selected voxels of cranial, otolith and post cranial elements as well as gut content, in 8.0.1 (FEI, VSG, SAS, Merignac, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three‐dimensional processing and rendering followed the protocols of Zanette et al () after semiautomatic segmentation of each skeletal unit using “generate surface,” and having used ImageJ (Rasband, −2005) for masking body wall of each skeletal unit. Direct volume rendering were used for visualizing the subset of selected voxels of cranial and post cranial elements as well as gut content, in AVIZO 7.1 and 8.0.1 (FEI, VSG, SAS, Merignac, France).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of 3D imaging techniques can be employed to study animal morphology and anatomy non-destructively or even entirely non-invasively (Ziegler et al 2008, Boistel et al 2011, Ziegler 2012, Zanette et al 2014, Gutiérrez et al 2018. These technologies include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a technique based on the principle of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as well as computed tomography (CT), which relies on differences in X-ray attenuation of biological tissues (Table 1).…”
Section: Digital Three-dimensional Imaging Techniques Provide New Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signifi cantly less damage to DNA can be observed when conventional μCT or CT systems are used (Paredes et al 2012, Hall et al 2015, Immel et al 2016, Wanek and Rühli 2016. In addition, due to technical limitations SRμCT is commonly performed using a FOV of only a few millimeters width and height (Zanette et al 2014), which obviously complicates the analysis of larger specimens. One example for SRμCT-based research on molluscs is provided by a study focusing on embryonic shell formation in a gastropod (Marxen et al 2008).…”
Section: Computed Tomography Techniques In Malacological Research μCtmentioning
confidence: 99%