Global Lorentzian Geometry 2017
DOI: 10.1201/9780203753125-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentzian Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall assume that every continuous causal (timelike) curve is equipped with a parametrization so that it is also a locally Lipschitz curve. That such a parametrization always exists is proven on page 75 of [8].…”
Section: Common Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We shall assume that every continuous causal (timelike) curve is equipped with a parametrization so that it is also a locally Lipschitz curve. That such a parametrization always exists is proven on page 75 of [8].…”
Section: Common Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Throughout this paper we restrict our attention to n-dimensional, paracompact, connected, Hausdorff, ∞ C manifolds  which are Lorentzian and time orientable. Standard definitions, e.g., of strong causality, the maximal extension of a manifold and of the generalized affine parameter, are taken from [8]. We do, however, deviate from [8] by using the 'total imprisonment' of [2] rather than the 'imprisonment' of [8].…”
Section: Common Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the time the second edition of their book was published, Beem and Ehrlich had worked to salvage the stability of geodesic (in)completeness by restricting attention to special cases. Consider the following proposition, which is representative of this effort (Beem et al 1996).…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we review what is known concerning the (in)stability of spacetime properties within this framework. After considering some foundational results concerning causal properties (Hawking 1969; Geroch 1970a) and a fascinating drama concerning geodesic (in)completeness (Beem et al 1996), we focus on the property of spacetime inextendibility, about which very little is known. Because inextendibility is defined relative to a background “possibility space” in the form of a standard collection of spacetimes, one can naturally consider variant definitions relative to other collections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%