2011
DOI: 10.18359/rfce.2192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Los determinantes de la divulgación de información sobre responsabilidad social corporativa en el sector financiero: el caso español

Abstract: Resumen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While 55.4%, 50.7% and 47.7% disclosures were on the labour practices and decent work, society and environment, there were apparent shortfalls of disclosures on the product responsibility (46.6%) and human rights (43.1%) dimensions of the sustainability reporting. The outcomes of this study are in line with the study of Sartori et al (2017), who found that disclosures on the economic performance were greater than the other ones, but in contrast to the study of Haro de Rosario et al (2011), who informed that disclosures on the environmental performance were greater than the other ones. Furthermore, the findings of this study are consistent with the study of Camargos et al (2014), who found noticeable variations between the different dimensions and within the dimensions of the GRI G4 sustainability reporting indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While 55.4%, 50.7% and 47.7% disclosures were on the labour practices and decent work, society and environment, there were apparent shortfalls of disclosures on the product responsibility (46.6%) and human rights (43.1%) dimensions of the sustainability reporting. The outcomes of this study are in line with the study of Sartori et al (2017), who found that disclosures on the economic performance were greater than the other ones, but in contrast to the study of Haro de Rosario et al (2011), who informed that disclosures on the environmental performance were greater than the other ones. Furthermore, the findings of this study are consistent with the study of Camargos et al (2014), who found noticeable variations between the different dimensions and within the dimensions of the GRI G4 sustainability reporting indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, the environmental dimension has received more focus from scholars’ research than the social and economic ones (Seuring and Muller, 2008; James et al , 2015). Haro de Rosario et al (2011) examined the sustainability reporting practices of 40 electric utilities worldwide and found that the disclosures on the environmental dimension are also more comprehensive than the social and economic dimensions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a considerable body of literature on the quality and quantity of sustainability reporting across different industries, the research on electric utilities' disclosure practices on sustainability is not substantial. Haro de Rosario et al (2011) studied the sustainability reporting practices of 40 electric utilities and found that the disclosures on the environmental category were more inclusive than the economic and social categories. Sartori et al (2017) examined the sustainability performance of 17 Brazilian electric utilities based on the GRI guidelines and found that the electric utilities "[…] systematically disclose an incomplete picture of how their activities affect society" (p. 49).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas cuentan con el apoyo de todo un equipo técnico del CSLI que les prestan asesoría y orientación en temas de cumplimiento de metas de generación de empleo, nivel de ingresos, sostenibilidad económica y demás indicadores financieros y de gestión como requisitos para continuar ope-rando. Hoy en día como lo describe (Haro, Alarcón y Caba, 2012), las empresas tienen que asumir una serie de compromisos para lograr una convivencia en armonía entre sus actividades licitas, encaminadas a obtención de beneficios así como la creación de valor para sus socios, y los objetivos globales de la sociedad. Estas empresas no cuentan con un programa de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial -RSE (Vélez, 2011), bajo el estándar internacional GRIque les ayude a fortalecer sus procesos misionales, estratégicos y de apoyo, informes que dan cuenta de la contribución de la empresa al desarrollo sostenible (Fernández y Larrinaga, 2007), y optimando algunas prácticas responsables que pueden mejorar la competitividad en las myPE´s, en estas cuatro áreas: aumento de ingresos, reducción de costos, aumentos de productividad, reducción de riesgos y aumento del valor de los activos (Vives & Peinado-Vara, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified