2012
DOI: 10.1515/zrp-2012-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Los locativos en la valencia de la construcción existencial española: ¿actante o circunstante?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the grammatical status of the adverbial phrase does not imply that it is completely optional, because its absence makes the expression uninformative when the NP argument cannot be located in the base space or a previously evoked mental space (Hernández-Díaz, 2006:1130–1132; Lyons, 1967; Meulleman & Roegiest, 2012). If we consider, for example, the last utterance of (8) in isolation of the evocation of the “high school” mental space, we cannot help but wonder against which setting we have to interpret the assertion.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the grammatical status of the adverbial phrase does not imply that it is completely optional, because its absence makes the expression uninformative when the NP argument cannot be located in the base space or a previously evoked mental space (Hernández-Díaz, 2006:1130–1132; Lyons, 1967; Meulleman & Roegiest, 2012). If we consider, for example, the last utterance of (8) in isolation of the evocation of the “high school” mental space, we cannot help but wonder against which setting we have to interpret the assertion.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second place, there is ample discussion among linguists as to whether a complement of space with existential haber (hay 'there is') is obligatory or optional (see Meulleman and Roegiest, 2012, for an overview and discussion, and Gast and Haas, 2011, for a comparative study of formulaic presentationals in Germanic and Romance). While this research then highlights the importance of space description for the functioning and interpretation of depersonalizing constructions, it mainly focusses on the syntactic features of one specific type of construction and it does not distinguish between deictic and non-deictic space descriptions.…”
Section: Depersonalization In Spanishmentioning
confidence: 99%