Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27395-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to confirm that the tempered stable subordinator is better than the stable one we show also the Laplace transform for the process {Y T (t)} with λ = 0 (the other parameters we estimate by using the same method as this presented in section 2). Moreover we test also the Gaussian and α−stable distributions for differenced series of DATA1 by using the methods based on the distance between empirical nad theoretical distribution functions, [44]. Those tests reject the hypothesis of the stable or Gaussian behavior of the observed data.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to confirm that the tempered stable subordinator is better than the stable one we show also the Laplace transform for the process {Y T (t)} with λ = 0 (the other parameters we estimate by using the same method as this presented in section 2). Moreover we test also the Gaussian and α−stable distributions for differenced series of DATA1 by using the methods based on the distance between empirical nad theoretical distribution functions, [44]. Those tests reject the hypothesis of the stable or Gaussian behavior of the observed data.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately fitting Skew Normal or Skew t distributions on positive data using a frequentist approach, as in Eling (2012), can lead to unappealing estimates because of the unboundedness of the likelihood with respect to the skewness parameter. Moreover, as pointed out by Burnecki et al (2010), usually claims distributions show the presence of small, medium and large size claims, characteristics that are hardly compatible with the choice of fitting a single parametric analytical distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different approaches, the analytical method consisting in estimating the unknown parameters of a given parametric family of probability distributions has been the most adopted in the actuarial literature. Since it is well recognized that the loss distribution is strongly skewed with heavy tails, different candidates for claim severity distribution have been considered in the applications: the log-Normal, the Burr, the Weibull the Gamma and the Generalized Pareto distribution in the context of Extreme Value Theory see for example McNeil (1997), Embrechts et al (1997) and Burnecki et al (2010) and references cited therein. Despite their extensive application, the theoretical properties of these distributions are not always empirically matched by observed stylized facts of insurance data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence for the use of Weibull distribution in Actuarial statistics is found in [1] [8]. In [8], the Weibull distribution was fitted to a small data set of hurricane losses whereas [9] have used it for modeling two illustrious set of published data namely the Danish Fire Insurance data and Property claim services data. Although, there can be other suitable models for loss modeling in General Insurance, we are primarily concerned with the Burr XII and Weibull distributions as loss models for our claim data and have concentrated on the computation of actuarial quantities like the probability of ultimate ruin through simulation and the probability function for the number of claims until ruin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%