2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04228.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of connexin36 increases retinal cell vulnerability to secondary cell loss

Abstract: Accruing evidence indicates that gap junctions are involved in neuronal survival after brain injury. The present study was aimed at clarifying the contribution of the neuronal gap-junction protein connexin36 (Cx36) to secondary cell loss after injury in the mouse retina. A focal retinal lesion was induced by infrared laser photocoagulation. Remarkably, this model allowed spatial and temporal definition of the lesion with high reproducibility. Moreover, Cx36 is abundantly expressed in the retina and plays an es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
44
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the impact of Cx expression extends beyond bystander death, because expression of Cx43, Cx36, Cx32, or Cx26 increased cellular injury resistance in a gap junction-independent pathway (Oguro et al, 2001;Lin et al, 2003;Striedinger et al, 2005). The phenotypic transformation that increases the injury threshold of Cx-expressing cells has not been established (Lin et al, 2003;Vetterlein et al, 2006) but may be similar to preconditioning involving efflux of neuroprotective agents through open hemichannels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of Cx expression extends beyond bystander death, because expression of Cx43, Cx36, Cx32, or Cx26 increased cellular injury resistance in a gap junction-independent pathway (Oguro et al, 2001;Lin et al, 2003;Striedinger et al, 2005). The phenotypic transformation that increases the injury threshold of Cx-expressing cells has not been established (Lin et al, 2003;Vetterlein et al, 2006) but may be similar to preconditioning involving efflux of neuroprotective agents through open hemichannels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports indicate that blocking gap junctions during development, ischemia, or traumatic brain injury rescues cells from apoptosis or necrosis, suggesting that gap junctions contribute to neural cell death (Cusato et al 2003(Cusato et al , 2006de Pina-Benabou et al 2005;Frantseva et al 2002a,b;Nodin et al 2005;Perez Velazquez et al 2006;Rami et al 2001;Rawanduzy et al 1997;Udawatte and Ripps 2005); others demonstrate that gap junctions are neuroprotective (Blanc et al 1998;Nakase et al 2003;Oguro et al 2001;Ozog et al 2002;Siushansian et al 2001;Striedinger et al 2005). Apparently, gap junctions may contribute to both neurodegeneration and neuroprotection depending on the type of connexins, cells coupled, region of the nervous system, stage of development, type of injury, and other factors.…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knock out of the Cx57 gene, the murine ortholog of the zebrafish drCx55.5, leads to a reduction of the receptive fields of horizontal cells (HCs) (Shelley et al 2006). In a focal retinal lesion model, Cx36 has been shown to contribute to secondary cell loss after injury (Striedinger et al 2005). Nevertheless, it is debatable whether the mouse is the appropriate animal model to study vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%