2019
DOI: 10.1075/dia.17004.iga
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of grammatical gender and language contact

Abstract: Despite its alleged relative stability, grammatical gender has nevertheless been completely lost in a number of languages. Through the analysis of three case studies (Afrikaans, Ossetic, and Cappadocian Greek) and a brief survey of similar developments in other languages, this article investigates the link between the loss of gender and language contact, which appears to be a key factor in the decline of gender systems. Drawing on recent research within the framework of sociolinguistic typology, I focus on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the experiment was not designed to model a specific case of natural language simplification, it is nevertheless useful to note that broadly similar patterns of reduction or loss of overspecified features have been claimed to follow language contact involving high numbers of L2 learners [ 77 ]. For example, many cases of overspecified features reconstructed for Proto-Germanic that are retained in most modern Germanic languages, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the experiment was not designed to model a specific case of natural language simplification, it is nevertheless useful to note that broadly similar patterns of reduction or loss of overspecified features have been claimed to follow language contact involving high numbers of L2 learners [ 77 ]. For example, many cases of overspecified features reconstructed for Proto-Germanic that are retained in most modern Germanic languages, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is clear that repeating information can be beneficial in noisy channels, and while there is evidence that agreement has certain functions in language processing [ 79 , 80 ], our point is that it is not necessary for languages to have a special device to perform these functions, they can operate equally well without it. Importantly, imperfect learning caused by language contact has been claimed to be a key factor in disappearance of agreement [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seems that not all contact leads to gender loss. In the context of Oromo dialects, it is only the intense and durable contact that leads to gender loss, not just adult second language learning which was argued to be the case in Igartua (2019), Dahl (2004) and Trudgill (2013). The findings further imply that loss of gender assignment precedes the loss of gender agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that, in Oromo, gender loss is initiated primarily by language contact, and that the stability in a gender assignment system is determined by gender stability in the adjacent or nearby languages. Following Igartua (2019) and Trudgill (2013), we also discuss major factors that have probably resulted in gender loss in Oromo. Based on Igartua (2019) and Clamons (1992), we further contend that changes in gender assignment and agreement favor simplicity.…”
Section: Gender Variation and The Typology Of Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it has been proposed that gender systems, another feature more typical of low-exotericity languages (11), tend to reduce in languages that undergo contact with other languages, especially those without gender, i.e. when the societies speaking these languages become more exoteric (14), or even disappear, as in Ossetic and Cappadocian Greek, where the loss of gender has also been linked to L2 learning and contact (15). Apart from adult L2 speakers failing to faithfully learn a foreign language, the simplification (loss or reduction of phonologically fused marking) can result from L1 speakers consciously or unconsciously accommodating their speech to the needs of the outsiders by reducing grammatical markers that pose acquisition difficulties (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%