2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-5965(00)00051-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss resilient H.263+video over the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still without any FEC assigned to Part 2 in this step, then . With the help of linear regression tools, we find that the following equation can fit the data of obtained with the above model-based FEC assignment algorithm well: (20) where is the ratio of the added FEC bits to the total transmitted bits (or FEC ratio); is a predefined parameter, and is found to yield good performance according to our experiments. We can see that is inversely proportional to and .…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still without any FEC assigned to Part 2 in this step, then . With the help of linear regression tools, we find that the following equation can fit the data of obtained with the above model-based FEC assignment algorithm well: (20) where is the ratio of the added FEC bits to the total transmitted bits (or FEC ratio); is a predefined parameter, and is found to yield good performance according to our experiments. We can see that is inversely proportional to and .…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, such protection schemes combating bit errors are only applicable to random noiselike errors, but may not be useful to packet loss in the Internet. Chung-How et al [20] proposed a loss resilient scheme for transporting video over the Internet, which only assigns FEC codes to motion part without any to texture part. Furthermore, this scheme does not provide any explicit method to determine how many FEC codes should be assigned to motion part to achieve optimal protection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, so that missing packets can be recovered [19]. With a video packet consisting of a Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) unit, k video packets of length L are buffered in an interleaver of depth n, and nÀ k parity packets are generated by a cross packet RS encoder.…”
Section: Cross Packet Fec Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RS decoder is able to recover up to t=nÀ k missing packets. The k video packets can then be reconstructed if any k packets are received out of the n. The main considerations in the choice of n and k are [19]:…”
Section: Cross Packet Fec Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slices provide points of temporal and spatial resynchronization, where the decoder can resume whenever the received video stream is corrupted. In adverse channel conditions, i.e., low received power, small NAL units are preferable [21], [22]. The peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) metric is used to measure the quality of a received video sequence.…”
Section: B H264 Video Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%