2017
DOI: 10.15361/1984-5529.2017v45n3p218-222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losses in the mechanized harvest of sugarcane as a function of working speed and rotation of the primary extractor

Abstract: Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) stands out as one of the main crops of Brazilian agribusiness. Currently, the crop harvesting process is predominantly mechanized. The objective was to evaluate the losses and impurities in the mechanized harvest of sugarcane as a function of working speed and rotation of the primary extractor. The experiment was conducted in a sugarcane harvested without previous burning, using the variety CTC 15 in its first cutting stage, classified as upright. The row spacing was 1.5 m and the av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since OPC, VI, and TVL are in statistical control but are not capable, it is the responsibility of the manager and team to investigate the influence exerted over these indicators and to act in a way to improve them to meet the specifications, making the process predictable. For example, a better balance between harvester and sugarcane yield could improve the performance of OPC (Ramos et al, 2016) or an increment in the rotation of the primary extractor yield better VI performance (Alcantara et al, 2017;Martins et al, 2017), or an increment in the speed of operation that improves the OPC but worsens TVL (Martins et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2014). Regardless of the action taken, it is important that all six indicators are monitored so that the optimum operation is achieved and not the optimum of one indicator only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since OPC, VI, and TVL are in statistical control but are not capable, it is the responsibility of the manager and team to investigate the influence exerted over these indicators and to act in a way to improve them to meet the specifications, making the process predictable. For example, a better balance between harvester and sugarcane yield could improve the performance of OPC (Ramos et al, 2016) or an increment in the rotation of the primary extractor yield better VI performance (Alcantara et al, 2017;Martins et al, 2017), or an increment in the speed of operation that improves the OPC but worsens TVL (Martins et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2014). Regardless of the action taken, it is important that all six indicators are monitored so that the optimum operation is achieved and not the optimum of one indicator only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the harvest displacement speed, other components should be regulated. As described by Martins et al (2017), the primary extractor rotation influences the amount of vegetable impurities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%