2012
DOI: 10.1890/12.wb.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost locations and the (ir)repeatability of ecological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment was carried out in the southern part of the Mátra Mountains (exact locations are given in Shapiro and Báldi, 2012), in northern Hungary in 2011. The elevation of the study area is between 400-500 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Study Site and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was carried out in the southern part of the Mátra Mountains (exact locations are given in Shapiro and Báldi, 2012), in northern Hungary in 2011. The elevation of the study area is between 400-500 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Study Site and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists and managers can easily visualize and share environmental information stored in Google Earth KML (Keyhole Markup Language) files, even while in the field. For example, use of KML files to describe survey locations and sampling points can improve experimental repeatability and quality in ecology (Shapiro and Baldi ). Indeed, scientific journals currently offer platforms that allow readers to access, explore, and share published geographic data using KML files (eg Elsevier's Interactive Map Viewer; WebTable 2 [link 9]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going forward, increasing the prevalence of reporting precise study locations in a standardized format (i.e., via geographic coordinates) is paramount. Although most ecology studies identify their study area and a large proportion report geographic coordinates [1,6,8], this information is effectively unusable if buried in the article text in myriad formats. Standards for reporting study areas must be developed and authors required to report their study area locations according to these standards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publication of erroneous location information is not uncommon [1,7,8]. Accordingly, processes should be implemented in the submission and editing of manuscripts to check the validity of the study location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation