Love phenomenon in culture: from ascesis to tragic

Вигель, Н Л; Шаповал, Г Н; Kartashova, Elena P.

doi:10.18522/1997-2377-2020-110-1-61-64

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The significance of not removing innate traits from androgyny theory is highlighted when either their attempted dilution or removal may be regarded as a threat to a person's integrity through a perceived impact on the inner sense of self (Weigel et al, 2020). The attempted merging of innate masculine and feminine characteristics may suppress effectiveness in services such as management, the military, in people generally unable to integrate parts of their masculine and feminine selves (Carlson, 1995).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

21st Century Neo-Androgyny: What Is Androgyny Anymore and Why We Should Still Care

Woodhill

Samuels

2022

Psychol Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The notion of psychological androgyny as a research tool loiters on in an incapacitated state. The lack of a general theory and the belief that the biological gender differences are insignificant to non-existent has been the seeds for its de-construction. Over the decades, the testing of ideas associated with androgyny has declined. Indeed, the debates over its usefulness as a construct ended long ago. The judgment nowadays is that debating the constructs of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny as behavioral traits has been long settled, and a contemporary revisiting of androgyny is not warranted. However, from another contemporary viewpoint, if androgyny is to have any future, it needs a new theory devoid of masculinity and femininity. We present a novel theory with the potential to do just that. This article details a new de-gendered theory of psychological androgyny, neo-androgyny, as a candidate to replace traditional models that are now considered outdated and irrelevant. We present five potential factors for inclusion in a de-gendered model: social efficacy, creativity, capability, eminence, and determination. We review these factors concerning the future of androgyny theory.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Androgyny served as a social catalyst for social justice and equality like never before; it focused on the social construction of many gender roles, which were ultimately malleable (Dean & Tate, 2017). Undoubtedly such a legacy makes androgyny a concept that has not had its time (Weigel et al, 2020).…”

Section: In Briefmentioning

confidence: 99%

21st Century Neo-Androgyny: What Is Androgyny Anymore and Why We Should Still Care

Woodhill

Samuels

2022

Psychol Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A philosophical view of aggression presents masculinity as manifesting itself in cruelty and violence where no peace negotiations or arguments in favor of tolerance can decrease its aggression (Weigel, et al, 2020). Within the 21 st -century 'Anthropocene', such an aberrant masculinity is nonessential (Meyer-Bahlburg, 2019); nonetheless, aggression has not yet evolved out of our species, perhaps simply because aggression is nowadays aligned more positively with 'heroics, a competitive spirit related to mate selection, supply and defense of resources' etcetera.'…”

Section: Aggressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sex vs Gender: Are We there Yet? A Biological Location for Gender, not Sex.

Woodhill¹

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research to date has left unexplained what may seem indefinable-gender identity. This article synthesizes important research that has not previously presented a case for a biological location of gender in the human phenotype. While gonadal sex and sexual orientation are accepted as emanating from genetic and hormonal templates, gender's existence currently has so far emanated from a nebulous 'somewhere' in the brain. Recent hypotheses have argued there is no natural dichotomy of gendered behavior and proposed a merging of otherwise distinct categories for sex and gender into a mosaic of sex/gender (Joel & McCarthy, 2017; Joel et al. 2016; Joel, 2011). However, this seems to detour around nonphysical behavior relevant to reproduction. This paper makes an original case for the sense of gender as neurophysiological and specifically centered within the reproductive axis. This fits in well with this current understanding of genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences on sexual identity (Joel et al., 2020) and with the earlier biopsycho-social approach (Eagly & Wood, 2013) now favored in research into identity diversity.

show abstract

Love phenomenon in culture: from ascesis to tragic

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

21st Century Neo-Androgyny: What Is Androgyny Anymore and Why We Should Still Care

21st Century Neo-Androgyny: What Is Androgyny Anymore and Why We Should Still Care

Sex vs Gender: Are We there Yet? A Biological Location for Gender, not Sex.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About