2015
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐altitude Terrestrial Spectroscopy from a Pushbroom Sensor

Abstract: Hyperspectral cameras sample many different spectral bands at each pixel, enabling advanced detection and classification algorithms. However, their limited spatial resolution and the need to measure the camera motion to create hyperspectral images makes them unsuitable for nonsmooth moving platforms such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). We present a procedure to build hyperspectral images from line sensor data without camera motion information or extraneous sensors. Our approach relies on an accompanying co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To alleviate reliance on GCPs, a significant amount of contributions make use of the co-acquisition of frame images, and develop methods to co-register the frame images and the scan lines. The most sophisticated algorithm seems to be given by [20]: the interior orientation of the pushbroom scanner is calibrated and the sensor is aligned with the frame camera using a target not parallel to the plane of the CCD array, and then the stitching of the frame images allows the construction of the hyperspectral mosaic. Additionally, this method does not require any navigation data, however, it supposes either the calibration with the triangle target prior to every flight, or the stability of the relative orientation of the two sensors.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate reliance on GCPs, a significant amount of contributions make use of the co-acquisition of frame images, and develop methods to co-register the frame images and the scan lines. The most sophisticated algorithm seems to be given by [20]: the interior orientation of the pushbroom scanner is calibrated and the sensor is aligned with the frame camera using a target not parallel to the plane of the CCD array, and then the stitching of the frame images allows the construction of the hyperspectral mosaic. Additionally, this method does not require any navigation data, however, it supposes either the calibration with the triangle target prior to every flight, or the stability of the relative orientation of the two sensors.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric correction can be divided into image-to-map correction and image-to-image correction. Image-to-map correction registers the images in question to existing reference data, such as the Digital Surface Model (DSM) [8][9][10][11] or Ground Control Points (GCPs) [12,13]. Image-to-image correction recoveries position and pose relations of images using tie points among the images [14][15][16], and is widely used in UAV data processing methods [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suomalainen et al [19] compensated for the inferior quality of direct geo-referencing information through simultaneous integration of captured frame images and a Digital Elevation Model (DEM), which was derived from the frame images. Ramirez-Paredes et al [20] Remote Sens. 2016, 8,796 3 of 22 presented a computer-vision approach for the indirect geo-referencing of the hyperspectral scenes, which estimated a set of transformation parameters relating the reference frames of frame and hyperspectral imagery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%