1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999gl005405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐angle normal fault earthquakes and triggering

Abstract: Abstract. Geologic evidence for low-angle normal faulting is overwhelming, and recent seismic, geodetic, and neotectonic studies have identified probable active examples. Thus, apparent low levels of historical seismicity on such faults is enigmatic. However, one large mainshock was a low-angle normal event, and three others may have been. One earthquake sequence had significant moment release from a triggered low-angle normal fault, and three earthquakes may have had normal subevents on low-angle planes. Such… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many normal faults have a listric geometry, and flatten out with depth (e.g., Shelton, 1984;Xiao and Suppe, 1992), even if some seismogenic faults are known to be low-angle normal faults (e.g., Abbott et al, 2001;Abers et al, 1997;Axen, 1999), the mechanism by which they trigger earthquakes is still under debate (e.g., Jackson and White, 1989;Lecomte et al, 2012). As stated above, the dip angles of the main faults in the Weihe graben vary from 40°to 71°, but are mostly N 50°, consistent with the subsurface fault geometry revealed by seismic reflection data (Xie, 2011).…”
Section: Geometric Characteristics Of Active Normal Faultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, many normal faults have a listric geometry, and flatten out with depth (e.g., Shelton, 1984;Xiao and Suppe, 1992), even if some seismogenic faults are known to be low-angle normal faults (e.g., Abbott et al, 2001;Abers et al, 1997;Axen, 1999), the mechanism by which they trigger earthquakes is still under debate (e.g., Jackson and White, 1989;Lecomte et al, 2012). As stated above, the dip angles of the main faults in the Weihe graben vary from 40°to 71°, but are mostly N 50°, consistent with the subsurface fault geometry revealed by seismic reflection data (Xie, 2011).…”
Section: Geometric Characteristics Of Active Normal Faultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Assuming that the z bdt is the deepest tip of the activation of a normal fault, the corresponding seismogenic volume (V) depends on the fault dip angle (α) and the lateral extent of the fault (L). In fact, low-angle normal fault rarely generates significant magnitude earthquakes (e.g., Axen, 1999), if any. A volume shape ratio L = 3•z is considered as proposed in Doglioni et al (2015b).…”
Section: Maximum Seismogenic Isovolumes Of Italymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now widespread agreement that many detachment faults were active at very low angles, even though the mechanics of such movement is still not well understood (e.g., Wernicke, 1981Wernicke, , 1995Rey nolds and Spencer, 1985;John, 1987a;Spencer and Chase, 1989;John and Foster, 1993;Axen, 1999). However, the details of detachment-fault movement histories have received little attention in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%