2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-carbohydrate diets: Effects on metabolism and exercise – A comprehensive literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, the threshold is less than 50 g per day, equivalent to about 10% of total energy intake. For “low-carbohydrate diets” (LCDs), carbohydrate daily intake should reach a maximum of 130 g per day, which is equivalent to less than 26% of total energy [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Impact Of Several Types Of Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some studies, the threshold is less than 50 g per day, equivalent to about 10% of total energy intake. For “low-carbohydrate diets” (LCDs), carbohydrate daily intake should reach a maximum of 130 g per day, which is equivalent to less than 26% of total energy [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Impact Of Several Types Of Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it seems that in the long-term, the effects of LCDs and VLCDs on weight loss may not be superior to more conventional strategies, such as calorie-restricted, low-fat diets and high-carbohydrate low-fat diets [ 17 ]. Regarding cardiometabolic risk markers, as observed for weight loss, the results are inconsistent when comparing LCD and VLCD to high-CHO and low-fat diets for high-density lipoprotein (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglyceride (TG), blood pressure, serum glucose and insulin [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Impact Of Several Types Of Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both LCD and LFD are beneficial for weight loss. Previous studies have shown that compared with participants on LFD, those on LCD experienced a greater weight loss reduction ( 56 , 65 ). Moreover, Mansoor et al found that even in healthy subjects, LCD is more effective for weight loss than LFD ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction of carbohydrate intake has attracted more and more attention in recent years for its potential in health promotion and treatment of diseases, including decreasing body mass, improving fat and carbohydrate metabolism, producing clinical improvements in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and reducing the predicted risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events ( 65 , 67 , 68 ). However, there are still controversial effects of LCD or the comparison between LCD and LFD ( 63 , 65 , 69 ). Some reasons that may be involved are as follows: (1) the criteria for included subjects are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, IF emerged as a multifaceted dietary tool to manage cardiometabolic problems such as dyslipidemia, elevated blood glucose levels, hypertension, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [5,6]. Taken together, the mechanisms ascribed to these benefits are mainly due to the fasting-induced adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/sirtuin 1 axis, whose enzymes activate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α) in skeletal muscle, adipocytes, cardiomyocytes, and hepatocytes, ultimately enhancing fatty acid oxidation and insulin sensitivity [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%