2007
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2007.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Coordinated Interference-Aware Beamforming for MIMO Broadcast Channels

Abstract: A novel Coordinated Interference-aware Beamforming (CIB) technique for Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) Broadcast Channels (BC) is introduced. The CIB technique uses a method based on maximization of the Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) at the front end of each receiver to balance the signal strength and the multi-user interference plus noise. This results in a closed form solution that can be used with any number of transmit and receive antennas. The resulting computational complexity is not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, joint power allocation and scheduling is considered in [1], [2], [3] and the use of joint zero-forcing beamforming and user scheduling is considered in [4], [5], [6], [7]. In addition to zero-forcing beamforming, eigen-mode beamforming [8], gradient-based beamforming [9], and other heuristic interference-aware beamforming designs [10], [11] have also been considered in the literature. From a more rigorous perspective, a concept known as uplink-downlink duality has emerged as a key solution to the problem of finding the optimal beamforming vectors to minimize transmit power subject to signal-to-interference-andnoise-ratio (SINR) constraints [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: E Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, joint power allocation and scheduling is considered in [1], [2], [3] and the use of joint zero-forcing beamforming and user scheduling is considered in [4], [5], [6], [7]. In addition to zero-forcing beamforming, eigen-mode beamforming [8], gradient-based beamforming [9], and other heuristic interference-aware beamforming designs [10], [11] have also been considered in the literature. From a more rigorous perspective, a concept known as uplink-downlink duality has emerged as a key solution to the problem of finding the optimal beamforming vectors to minimize transmit power subject to signal-to-interference-andnoise-ratio (SINR) constraints [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: E Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us denote by h7m, and hm the mth columns of HTX,k and HRX,k, respectively. Assuming all users are using chip-level MMSE receivers, the SINR of the mth entry can be expressed, as in [6], Vm = 1, ..., RG (6) wim th t N ZcHkhm with (q,j)=(RGUK) 4?k(m = (k1,1 (q,j) = (l,1) (q,j)7A(m, k) and Rx k Tx,khk Globally maximization of every r4m is difficult due to the dependency among all hX Zs. Using the approximation and the inequalities introduced in [6], the approximate on a lower bound of that SINR is > hTx k kkTx,k…”
Section: Coordinated Interference-aware Beamformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, when some fairness needs to be considered by the operator, simultaneous transmission to multiple users at one time may be required. The proposed technique, similar to Coordinated Interference-aware Beamforming (CIB), for flat-fading channels [5] and [6], can provide means to schedule multiple users to be active. Chip-level receivers are well understood and discussed in [7], [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the convergence of these iterative algorithms cannot be guaranteed [12]. In order to circumvent the iterative nature of the conventional CBF, a suboptimal beamforming method was introduced in [13]. Also the author in [14] proposed a zero-forcing solution valid for two transmit antenna systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%