2021
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202100232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐cost polymer‐film spiral inertial microfluidic device for label‐free separation of malignant tumor cells

Abstract: We developed a low-cost polymer-film spiral inertial microfluidic device for the effective size-dependent separation of malignant tumor cells. The device was fabricated in polymer films by rapid laser cutting and chemical bonding. After fabricating the prototype device, the separation performance of our device was evaluated using particles and cells. The effects of operational flow rate, cell diameter, and cell concentration on the separation performance were explored. Our device successfully separated tumor c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most attention has been paid to inertial microfluidics because the cell separation can be achieved via inertial lift force 32 and Dean drag force 33 over a wide range of Reynolds numbers (1-100). However, the previous inertial microfluidics [34][35][36] for MTC separation found it difficult to handle samples with high cell concentrations. To ensure separation performance, lysis pretreatment of red blood cells (RBCs) was required (see Table S1 †), which complicated the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most attention has been paid to inertial microfluidics because the cell separation can be achieved via inertial lift force 32 and Dean drag force 33 over a wide range of Reynolds numbers (1-100). However, the previous inertial microfluidics [34][35][36] for MTC separation found it difficult to handle samples with high cell concentrations. To ensure separation performance, lysis pretreatment of red blood cells (RBCs) was required (see Table S1 †), which complicated the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%