2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low cost porous alumina with tailored gas permeability and mechanical properties prepared using rice husk and sucrose for filter applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous works on porous ceramics, gas permeability proved to be directly dependent on the total pore-volume fraction [32], tortuosity, and the average pore size of the sample [29,32,37,38]. Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure Dependencementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous works on porous ceramics, gas permeability proved to be directly dependent on the total pore-volume fraction [32], tortuosity, and the average pore size of the sample [29,32,37,38]. Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure Dependencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the permeability is known as a function of the microstructure, then the pressure drop can be predicted under a given flow rate and the microstructure can be improved by tailoring pore characteristics [28]. However, high values of porosity cause lower mechanical strength and stability [22][23][24], despite the high permeability [29], and thus finding the balance between the two parameters is one of the main challenges in making a suitable material for filtering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localized anodizing of metal surfaces using electrochemical droplet cell techniques is of prime importance for the fabrication of thin film capacitors, resistors, electronic circuits, interconnects and porous alumina filters [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] . Two types of electrochemical droplet cells, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Thus far, compared with freeze casting 12 or direct foaming, 2,8 slurry gelation and foaming, 13 and other foaming methods, 14 the use of pore-forming agents which can dominate the shape, size, and amount of pores in porous materials by choosing suitable pore-forming agents type, size, and incorporation content 15 is still the most common used method to produce porous ceramics with porosity not more than 70%. 16 A wide variety of pore-forming agents such as coffee grounds, bioactive yeast, polystyrene sphere (PS), poppy seed, corn cob, and activated carbon 4,[17][18][19][20][21] had been employed for preparing porous ceramics. Among the various pore-forming agents, those from biological sources which include not only microorganisms, plant stems, leaves, fruits, seeds, etc, but also some agricultural and sideline products and their byproducts generated in course of manufacture have occupied a great proportion because of their easy ejection (by burning them out) without any toxicity and low prices; some of them can even play dual roles as binder and pore former, for instance sucrose and wheat particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, compared with freeze casting 12 or direct foaming, 2,8 slurry gelation and foaming, 13 and other foaming methods, 14 the use of pore‐forming agents which can dominate the shape, size, and amount of pores in porous materials by choosing suitable pore‐forming agents type, size, and incorporation content 15 is still the most common used method to produce porous ceramics with porosity not more than 70% 16 . A wide variety of pore‐forming agents such as coffee grounds, bioactive yeast, polystyrene sphere (PS), poppy seed, corn cob, and activated carbon 4,17‐21 had been employed for preparing porous ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%