2014
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201300119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Cost Universal High‐k Dielectric for Solution Processing and Thermal Evaporation Organic Transistors

Abstract: SAM is needed to reduce the leakage current through the gate and dielectric. Some of the SAMs would require relatively long preparation time [12][13][14] and usually the functional head groups of SAMs is dielectric specifi c. It is challenging to develop a universal SAMs suitable for different dielectric insulators. More importantly, the SAM also modifi es the surface energy of the dielectric and affects the crystallinity of the organic semiconductors. It is necessary to employ a suitable SAM to achieve high c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(c) , we can see that there are three diffraction peaks, (001), (002) and (003). The (001) peak at around 2θ = 5.57° shows the highest intensity, thus suggesting that the d-spacing (between lattice planes parallel to the substrate) in the z-axis direction is 1.59 nm, which is similar to previously reported values 28 30 . The values of the 2θ diffraction peaks are the same for DNTT films deposited at different temperatures, which indicates that the d-spacings in the z-axis direction are identical among these films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2(c) , we can see that there are three diffraction peaks, (001), (002) and (003). The (001) peak at around 2θ = 5.57° shows the highest intensity, thus suggesting that the d-spacing (between lattice planes parallel to the substrate) in the z-axis direction is 1.59 nm, which is similar to previously reported values 28 30 . The values of the 2θ diffraction peaks are the same for DNTT films deposited at different temperatures, which indicates that the d-spacings in the z-axis direction are identical among these films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[67] The dielectric was fabricated by exposing the thermally evaporated Al to oxygen plasma to form an ≈2 nm thick oxide layer on top, followed by the formation of [96] www.advancedsciencenews.com a phosphonic acid monolayer through self-assembly. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83] More importantly, the solution processing of sol-gel dielectrics, such as spin coating, bar coating, spray coating, and inkjet printing, always generates an extremely smooth dielectric surface with a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of ≈0.3 nm. As a result, both the thermal evaporated organic p-type and n-type FETs turned on at a −3 V gate bias.…”
Section: High-k Dielectric Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the role of SAMs was intensively studied by varying the alky chain length, the tail group, and the effect of deposition methods. [76,79] The composition of 184.9 and 253.7 nm UV light converted oxygen into a reactive O spices and then diffused into a BST thin film and reacted with its oxygen vacancies to form lattice oxygen at the same time to remove organic impurities. [28] Other than SAMs, chemical vapor-deposited parylene-C can also be used to enhance the electrical strength of oxidized ultrathin AlO x , and an off-to-on switching within a 1.5 V gate bias is achieved at an optimized parylene-C thickness.…”
Section: High-k Dielectric Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that the density of the materials (1.473 g cm −3 for DNTT and 0.96–1.04 g cm −3 for PS) is not directly related to the position of DNTT layer observed and instead the surface energy of the substrate can influence the position of the DNTT layer. The surface energies of the OTS‐ and UV/O 3 ‐treated substrates determined by the Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble method have been reported to be 23.5 and 72 mN m −1 , respectively, and the surface energy of DNTT (43.87 mN m −1 ) falls between the two values . This suggests that the lower surface energy of the OTS‐treated substrate than that of DNTT could induce favorable nucleation of the DNTT crystals on the substrate, inducing DNTT layer formation under the PS layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%