2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose Enzalutamide in Late-Elderly Patients (≥ 75 Years Old) Presenting With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of enzalutamide might be impaired by reducing the initial dose, even though the PSA-PFS was not statistically different in this study, possibly because of the limited number of patients and events. Vinh-Hung et al reported a retrospective study investigating the efficacy of low-dose enzalutamide in patients aged �75 years with metastatic CRPC and concluded that PSA response and PSA-PFS were not significantly different between the low dose and the standard dose groups PLOS ONE [12]. However, this retrospective study was limited in that 55 patients were stratified to 16 low dose and 43 standard dose groups.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficacy of enzalutamide might be impaired by reducing the initial dose, even though the PSA-PFS was not statistically different in this study, possibly because of the limited number of patients and events. Vinh-Hung et al reported a retrospective study investigating the efficacy of low-dose enzalutamide in patients aged �75 years with metastatic CRPC and concluded that PSA response and PSA-PFS were not significantly different between the low dose and the standard dose groups PLOS ONE [12]. However, this retrospective study was limited in that 55 patients were stratified to 16 low dose and 43 standard dose groups.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 93%
“…A retrospective study of Japanese patients with CRPC reported that age >75 years was positively associated, and a lower initial dose of enzalutamide was negatively associated, with the occurrence of AEs [11]. Another retrospective study reported that efficacy of low-dose enzalutamide in terms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) response and PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was not statistically inferior to that of the standard dose in patients with metastatic CRPC aged �75 years [12]. However, significant biases should exist regarding patient background between the patients with the low and standard initial doses in both retrospective studies, and the influence of initial dose reduction on efficacy and safety remain to be well elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore median PFS was 11.2 months versus 11.9 months ( p value 0.612) for patients receiving low dose and the standard dose respectively. The authors concluded that low-dose enzalutamide in elderly, symptomatic, poor-PS patients with metastatic disease was associated with the high response rate and survival compared to standard dose [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natchagande et al reported another case of an 87-year-old patient treated with 40 mg enzalutamide who showed a good response without relevant toxicity[ 11 ]. Furthermore, a recent Caribbean retrospective chart review suggested that an enzalutamide dose ≤ 80 mg qd ( n = 16) leads to comparable responses in elderly patients with metastatic prostate cancer as compared to patients on 160 mg qd ( n = 43)[ 12 ]. In neither studies plasma trough levels of enzalutamide and its metabolite NDME were measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%