1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.464334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy elastic electron scattering by tetrafluoromethane (CF4)

Abstract: We report cross sections for electronically elastic electron scattering by CF 4 from 1 to 40 eV, calculated within the static-exchange approximation using the Schwinger multichannel method. Although the static-exchange approximation does not give results that are accurate in detail below 20 eV, it is useful in understanding resonant features in the elastic and vibrationally inelastic cross sections. Above 20 eV, where the static-exchange approximation is more reliable, we derive a dissociation cross section in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 The use of the SAOP and LB94 xc potentials provides a partial screening of the hole formed during the photoionization process, while the screening is completely lacking in a frozen core formalism; this could partially explain energy shifts between KS and FCHF profiles. Moreover, the FCHF results fail to predict the correct symmetry of resonant states characterized in previous ab initio electronmolecule scattering calculations 65,66 and confirmed by our DFT calculations ͑vide infra͒. One could speculate that deficiencies in the FCHF potential prove unusually large for CF 4 , but also accurate experimental cross section measurements would be needed for a complete assessment of the performances of the KS and FCHF methods for this particular case.…”
Section: A Valence Ionizationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…43 The use of the SAOP and LB94 xc potentials provides a partial screening of the hole formed during the photoionization process, while the screening is completely lacking in a frozen core formalism; this could partially explain energy shifts between KS and FCHF profiles. Moreover, the FCHF results fail to predict the correct symmetry of resonant states characterized in previous ab initio electronmolecule scattering calculations 65,66 and confirmed by our DFT calculations ͑vide infra͒. One could speculate that deficiencies in the FCHF potential prove unusually large for CF 4 , but also accurate experimental cross section measurements would be needed for a complete assessment of the performances of the KS and FCHF methods for this particular case.…”
Section: A Valence Ionizationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…1 is artifactual. It is also important to note that, in the related fluorocarbon CF 4 , similar resonant peaks are seen in the fixed-nuclei elastic cross sections computed by various methods, [28][29][30][31] but not in the measured vibrationally elastic cross section; 32,33 rather, in CF 4 one finds strong resonant enhancement of the vibrationally inelastic cross sections 32,34 in the relevant energy range. We therefore speculate that much, if not most of the resonant enhancement of the C 2 HF 5 FN elastic cross section, may likewise contribute to vibrational excitation.…”
Section: A Elastic Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because we neglect nuclear motion, the electronically elastic cross section we obtain does not distinguish between the vibrationally elastic and vibrationalexcitation cross sections. In CF 4 , for example, shape resonances in our computed elastic cross section 11 were not seen in the measured vibrationally elastic cross section 12,13 but were quite prominent in the vibrational-excitation 12,14 and total-scattering 15 cross sections. At very low impact energies, a fixed-nuclei description of SF 6 scattering is certain to be qualitatively incorrect, because the dominant process ͑forma-tion of metastable anions͒ involves nuclear motion.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%