1998
DOI: 10.1021/jp981886k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Energy Electron-Induced Damage in Hexadecanethiolate Monolayers

Abstract: Low-energy electron-induced damage in hexadecanethiolate (HDT) monolayers on gold substrates has been investigated using infrared reflection−absorption spectroscopy (IRAS), angle-resolved near edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (NEXAFS), and advancing water contact angle measurements. HDT films were exposed to electrons of energies 10−100 eV and doses between 30 and 14 000 μC/cm2. The induced damage was monitored both “in situ” by NEXAFS measurements interleaved with electron irradiations and “e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
112
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
15
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show a significant p à resonance after less than 20 s of electron irradiation, a resonance signature that grows with increase in irradiation time. These results agree with those of Muller et al [41] who found that damage induced by electron irradiation in hexanedecanethiolate SAMs on gold shows up in the NEXAFS spectrum as a rapid growth of the p à resonance.…”
Section: Nexafs: X-irradiationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results show a significant p à resonance after less than 20 s of electron irradiation, a resonance signature that grows with increase in irradiation time. These results agree with those of Muller et al [41] who found that damage induced by electron irradiation in hexanedecanethiolate SAMs on gold shows up in the NEXAFS spectrum as a rapid growth of the p à resonance.…”
Section: Nexafs: X-irradiationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The positions and FWHM (~1.2 eV) of the S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 peaks are essentially equivalent to those for conventional self assembled monolayers of alkanethiols. [48] Thus, the upper surface of the thiol nanostructure ( Figure 7c) is similar to a monolayer of thiols where all the Scontaining head-group reside on the outside of the structure (also depicted schematically in Figure 7b). Indeed, dedicated STM measurements (Figure 7e) were acquired of the organic segment of a side-view barcoded nanofiber.…”
Section: Free-standing Ordered Organic Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This variation is mostly related to the dehydrogenation of the SAM-ambient interface. [15,16] Other irradiation-induced processes, such as desorption of the chain fragments, disordering, crosslinking, and cleavage of the primary Au-thiolate bonds contribute to a minor extent to the wetting properties. [16] The respective results are presented in Figure 1, where h a for the DT/Au sample, which was subsequently irradiated and immersed into the MUDA/EtOH solution (2 h) for the purpose of exchange, is given as a function of irradiation dose kept below 1 mC cm -2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%