1973
DOI: 10.1154/s0376030800005279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Energy X-Ray and Electron Absorption Within Solids (100-1500 ev Region)

Abstract: Quantitative analysis by x-ray fluorescence and photoelectron and Auger electron analysis can be effectively extended through a precise knowledge of the total aad subshell photoionization cross sections. Light element and intermediate element analysis, as based upon K and L series fluorescence respectively, involve x-ray interactions in the low energy region, Optimized analysis for essentially all the elements by x-ray induced photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopy involves both x-ray and electron inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is quite simple: the vicinity of the MS edge in these elements produces a strong and nonlinear variation of MAC with wavelength, which makes inter-and extrapolation very dangerous. In many cases the new values we propose are somewhere intermediate between the older values of Henke and Ebisu (1974) and the more recent ones of Henke et al (1982); quite frequently, however, the older values seem to be better. As soon as an absorption edge is passed, the evaluation process has to start anew.…”
Section: What Can Be Achievedcontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The reason for this is quite simple: the vicinity of the MS edge in these elements produces a strong and nonlinear variation of MAC with wavelength, which makes inter-and extrapolation very dangerous. In many cases the new values we propose are somewhere intermediate between the older values of Henke and Ebisu (1974) and the more recent ones of Henke et al (1982); quite frequently, however, the older values seem to be better. As soon as an absorption edge is passed, the evaluation process has to start anew.…”
Section: What Can Be Achievedcontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Log ;. versus loci E linear and quadratic regression fits to 3 n'easuremen?s of uranium Attenuation coefficients, r.. (cm /a) compared with theory (3) and compilations(11,12),…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, there is a significant advantage in working with small thicknesses in order to minimize the effect of FSE on k A B factors and the effect of absorption. In this context, the critical thickness, t,, necessary to prevent absorption, calculated using the Tixier &Philibert (1969) criterion andHenke &Ebisu (1974) mass absorption coefficients, is equal to 6 nm for a B-95 wtyo Fe alloy, at which about 4.7% of the X-rays would be generated by FSE. Since it would be difficult to prepare a foil thinner than 6 nm, the effect of FSE should be included in the calculation of k A B factors, and the effect of B concentration on k* at 100 keV will be significant since practical thickness values range from 50 to 100 nm.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%