1998
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.1998.11740554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low frequency of clinically silent circulating emboli in patients with mitral valve prolapse or patent foramen ovale detected by bigated transcranial Doppler ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 The absence of MES in patients with mitral valve prolapse and the low frequency of MES in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) reflect the reduced embolic potential of these two cardiac abnormalities. 41 Transcranial Doppler monitoring after the intravenous injection of agitated saline reliably detects paradoxical cerebral embolism through a PFO. 42 …”
Section: Cardiac Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 The absence of MES in patients with mitral valve prolapse and the low frequency of MES in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) reflect the reduced embolic potential of these two cardiac abnormalities. 41 Transcranial Doppler monitoring after the intravenous injection of agitated saline reliably detects paradoxical cerebral embolism through a PFO. 42 …”
Section: Cardiac Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In vivo, cerebral ischemia has been postulated as one of several potential triggers for migraine attacks. 7 Most of these microembolic signals are thought to arise from thrombi of the venous circulation. 7 Most of these microembolic signals are thought to arise from thrombi of the venous circulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droste et al documented MES in three out of 14 cases, whereas other investigators detected MES in 27% of PFO positive patients and 18% of PFO negative patients (OR = 1.76, P = .327). 108,109 In addition, the mean number of MES per hour was higher in PFO cases (.70 ± 1.47 vs. .23 ± .55; P = .026). Moreover, when PFO was combined with atrial septal aneurysm, MES counts were significantly higher than in all other patient groups.…”
Section: Patent Foramen Ovalementioning
confidence: 91%
“…A limited number of studies have assessed MES presence in individuals with PFO. Droste et al documented MES in three out of 14 cases, whereas other investigators detected MES in 27% of PFO positive patients and 18% of PFO negative patients (OR = 1.76, P = .327) . In addition, the mean number of MES per hour was higher in PFO cases (.70 ± 1.47 vs. .23 ± .55; P = .026).…”
Section: Cardiac Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%