2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-latency list decoding of polar codes with double thresholding

Abstract: For polar codes with short-to-medium code length, list successive cancellation decoding is used to achieve a good error-correcting performance. However, list pruning in the current list decoding is based on the sorting strategy and its timing complexity is high. This results in a long decoding latency for large list size. In this work, aiming at a low-latency list decoding implementation, a double thresholding algorithm is proposed for a fast list pruning. As a result, with a negligible performance degradation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogous to the classic SC decoder, the SCL decoding scheme also suffers from a high latency due to the data dependencies associated with the decoding process. In this context, various low-latency SCL decoding schemes have been presented in [94], [104], [105], [108], [110], [111], [117]. Furthermore, the complexity of an SCL decoder is L times higher than that of a classic SC decoder, since it processes L candidate paths.…”
Section: Successive Cancellation List (Scl) Decodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to the classic SC decoder, the SCL decoding scheme also suffers from a high latency due to the data dependencies associated with the decoding process. In this context, various low-latency SCL decoding schemes have been presented in [94], [104], [105], [108], [110], [111], [117]. Furthermore, the complexity of an SCL decoder is L times higher than that of a classic SC decoder, since it processes L candidate paths.…”
Section: Successive Cancellation List (Scl) Decodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our measurement under typical code lengths, the main source of latency is now incurred by the general nodes whose constituent code rates are between 2 B and B−2 B . Motivated by [7]- [11], and thanks to the recent advances in efficient list pruning [14], [15], we find it profitable to further improve parallelism for ultra-low-latency applications. Our contributions are summarized below: 1) We propose to fully parallelize the processing of R1/SPC nodes via multi-bit hard estimation and flipping at intermediate stages.…”
Section: B Motivation and Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a different approach, path metrics were approximately sorted with double thresholding method proposed in [26]. It compares 2L path metrics with two thresholds, AT and RT .…”
Section: B Path Metric Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%