2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2018.2884791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Latency Scheduling in MPTCP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the receiver buffer problem [32] in multipath transport, [30] proposes the Penalisation and Retransmission (PR) mechanism. [28] derives a rule-of-thumb for buffer size for MPTCP based on the RTT difference of the paths; and [29] explores an implementation that could send packets outof-order, both with the ambition to overcome head-of-line (HoL) blocking.…”
Section: B the State Of The Art Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To solve the receiver buffer problem [32] in multipath transport, [30] proposes the Penalisation and Retransmission (PR) mechanism. [28] derives a rule-of-thumb for buffer size for MPTCP based on the RTT difference of the paths; and [29] explores an implementation that could send packets outof-order, both with the ambition to overcome head-of-line (HoL) blocking.…”
Section: B the State Of The Art Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, [37] proposes a lossaware scheduler targeting networks with more than 20% loss rates. Finally, [32] proposes the Short Transfer Time First (STTF) scheduler. However, it specifically targets low-latency for short transfers, and it explores interactions with TCP specific aspects such as TCP Small Queues (TSQ).…”
Section: B the State Of The Art Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the asymmetry problem caused by the latency difference, STMS [37] scheduler sends packets with smaller sequence number to a fast path while sending packets with larger sequence number to a slow path, allowing packets sent over different paths to arrive simultaneously. Considering the continuously increasing demand for mobile communication, literature [38] presents two novel scheduling schemes which are the block estimation (BLEST) scheduler and the shortest transmission time first (STTF) scheduler to guarantee low-latency communication of MPTCP. To improve the performance of latency-sensitive applications over MPTCP in high-delay and lossy networks, literature [39] proposes a new framework using a XOR-based dynamic FEC scheme to reduce the flow completion time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coding: Network Coding Scheduling: Paths Hurtig et al [103] Scheduling: Paths QoS-MPTPC [104] Scheduling: Packets ADMIT [105] Coding: FEC…”
Section: Fmtcp [102]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NC-MPTCP [101] and fountain code-based multipath TCP (FMTCP) [102] utilize network coding to boost the overall goodput and outperform the MPTCP in the case of highly dissimilar subflow conditions. Hurtig et al [103] present two novel scheduling techniques for the MPTCP (BLEST and STTF) that are shown to reduce latency when interfaces have asymmetric capacity and delay. The QoS-MPTPC [104], ADMIT [105] and PR-MPTCP+ [106] are extensions for interactive video, video streaming and real-time multimedia, respectively.…”
Section: ) Multiple Connectivity and Multipath Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%