2002
DOI: 10.1177/004208502128847397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Level Violence: A Neglected Aspect of School Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
44
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Victims of bullying are often portrayed as loners (Adams, Cox, & Dunstan, 2004;Dupper & Meyer-Adams, 2002;Smith, Talamelli, Cowie, Naylor, & Chauhan, 2004). This was not found in this study.…”
Section: Friendship In Schooling Spacescontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Victims of bullying are often portrayed as loners (Adams, Cox, & Dunstan, 2004;Dupper & Meyer-Adams, 2002;Smith, Talamelli, Cowie, Naylor, & Chauhan, 2004). This was not found in this study.…”
Section: Friendship In Schooling Spacescontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Studies by Ashley (2003), Reid, Monsen, and Rivers (2004), Askew (1989), and Dupper and Meyer-Adams (2002) demonstrate that teachers who convey that some people are respected less than others by sarcasm, shouting, threats, ridicule, and favoritism may be directly attributing to bullying. The reflections of the respondents show this and, in particular, Daniel felt that his PE teachers showed favoritism and that this reinforced homophobic bullying.…”
Section: Teachers In Classroom Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School climate measures such as student perception of the fairness of rules, teachers' respect for students, and the like are more predictive of serious offenses than minor misconduct. 29 Yet, a vicious cycle of school disorder and misconduct produces a culture of "low-level violence" 30 that represents a continuous threat to adolescents' sense of safety. In this sense, disorderliness is the secondary school's version of broken windows, 24 which serves to signal to students a lack of consistent adult concern and oversight that can leave them feeling unsafe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group dynamics required for and created by such behaviour contributes to the overall culture and climate of schools and social groups. Not surprisingly, schools with higher rates of exclusion are perceived as less safe (Astor et al, 2002;Dupper & Meyer-Adams, 2002). Faced with such statistics, schools struggle to find effective responses to social exclusion and to prevent its negative consequences in their hallways, cafeterias, gyms and classes.…”
Section: Social Exclusion: Definitions Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%