1981
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/7/1/012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-lying levels in83Kr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Its yield curve rises more steeply than that of the 1122keV transition and its relatively high intensity is suggestive of an yrast transition. We therefore propose a J" = 15/2+ assignment to the 2266 keV level in contradiction to the assignment J" = 9/2+ by Cartwright et a1 [9]. On the basis of the steep slope of the yield curve of the 1362 k e y transition, we tentatively assign J = 17/2 to the 2484 keV level.…”
Section: Spin and Panty Assignmentscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its yield curve rises more steeply than that of the 1122keV transition and its relatively high intensity is suggestive of an yrast transition. We therefore propose a J" = 15/2+ assignment to the 2266 keV level in contradiction to the assignment J" = 9/2+ by Cartwright et a1 [9]. On the basis of the steep slope of the yield curve of the 1362 k e y transition, we tentatively assign J = 17/2 to the 2484 keV level.…”
Section: Spin and Panty Assignmentscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Some preliminary data derived from the "Se(&, n ~) ~~K r reaction has been previously reported in [7], and cited by Lederer et al [8]. As our investigation was in its final stages, a similar study of levels in 83Kr was published by Cartwright et al [9]. That work deals primarily with experimental data from the ?3e(a, ny)83Kr reaction, but also includes some results from Coulomb excitation of 83Kr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental data taken from Refs. [13][14][15][16][17][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Also shown is the B(E2; 2 + 1 → 0 + 1 ) value predicted for 78 Ni in Ref.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]/5 is the effective vibrator charge, and gg, gz and g~ are, respectively, the collective, orbital and spin gyromagnetic ratios.The mixing ratio 6(E2/M1) for the E2 and M1 transitions reads[4] If) = (gs c + g,D + gRE),uN(8 b) and the quantities A, B, C, D and E are calculated from the model wave functions. The Hamiltonian was diagonalized with the following set of parameters:(a) pairing strength G=0.29MeV, which follows from the estimate of Kisslinger and Sorensen [5] (G = 25/.4 MeV);(b) phonon energy hcoe=l.56MeV, is the experimental energy of 2~ state in the single-closed-shell S6Kr nucleus[6];…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%