2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-order continuous-time robust repetitive control: Application in nanopositioning

Abstract: A low-order repetitive control (RC) design in continuous-time for nanopositioning applications is presented. It focuses on achieving high performance and sufficient robustness to uncertainties. The design is mainly applicable to analog implementation, but due to the exceptionally low order, it also results in a fast and efficient digital implementation. Experimental results for an analog implementation using a bucket brigade device (BBD), as well as a digital implementation, is presented. RC can provide fast a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability margin of the system is increased by using k s = 1.5. Due to the hysteresis in the piezoelectric actuator, the effective gain of the actuator is known to change by up to 80% , hence a constant margin should capture this uncertainty well. The frequency response of the filter and the stability criterion () are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability margin of the system is increased by using k s = 1.5. Due to the hysteresis in the piezoelectric actuator, the effective gain of the actuator is known to change by up to 80% , hence a constant margin should capture this uncertainty well. The frequency response of the filter and the stability criterion () are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they cannot provide asymptotic tracking either. Though tracking triangular trajectories can be tracked via the internal 5model principle using repetitive control [11] or iterative learning control [30], these techniques have several drawbacks: a) they are complicated to design, b) they require several cycles of the signal in order to reduce the tracking error, which deems them inapplicable for non-periodic signals, c) they require perfect knowledge of all the parameters of the system, or in the case of uncertainties, they must be combined with robust control schemes [11] [30]. A simpler approach would be extremely beneficial for such applications.…”
Section: Dof-pi 2 D Desginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different actuation methods available, piezoelectric actuators (PEAs) [5,6] have been extensively adopted in micro-/nanopositioning applications mainly due to their nanometer-scale resolution, high bandwidth, high force density and, absence of backlash and stick-slip [7]. The early models of piezoelectric tube scanners have been replaced by various PEA-driven nanopositioners capable of providing multi-DOF motions [8][9][10][11]. Flexurebased nanopositioners are popular due to several key advantages viz: low cross-coupling between motion axes, robust mechanical construction, large motion range and high mechanical bandwidth [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, an approach based on modified repetitive control is proposed for high-speed tracking control of piezo-actuated nanopositioning stages in [11]. A low-order repetitive control design in continuous-time for piezo-based nanopositioning system was proposed in [12]. The authors in [13] introduced a novel modeling and identification for approach for piezoelectric-actuated stages by cascading hysteresis nonlinearity with linear dynamics, which is described as a Hammerstein-like structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%