2003
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000084569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Pay and Income in Urban and Rural Areas: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey

Abstract: This paper examines the extent of urban-rural differences in low pay and the link between low pay and low incomes using data on urban and rural residents from the British Household Panel Survey for 1991-98. The results suggest that, overall, urban wages were significantly less than accessible rural but significantly more than remote rural wages even after adjustments were made for differences in observed characteristics. A lower percentage of urban workers who experienced low pay were also resident in low-inco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some attempt should be made to gain a reasonably representative sample of disabled people, as well as those earning up to or less than 60% of national median income. As in previous studies on in-work poverty, a good sample would reflect, for example, low levels of work intensity (Fraser, 2011), a balance between geographical location of participants (Gilbert et al, 2003), and jobs reflecting lower and middle skilled occupations known to characterise in-work poverty (Scottish Government, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some attempt should be made to gain a reasonably representative sample of disabled people, as well as those earning up to or less than 60% of national median income. As in previous studies on in-work poverty, a good sample would reflect, for example, low levels of work intensity (Fraser, 2011), a balance between geographical location of participants (Gilbert et al, 2003), and jobs reflecting lower and middle skilled occupations known to characterise in-work poverty (Scottish Government, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a difference in the wage of identical people in identical jobs across regions. Gilbert et al (2003) found that, after adjusting for observable characteristics, urban wages were significantly less than those in accessible rural areas but more than in remote rural areas. One explanation for nominal wage differences is variation in the cost of living between the rural and urban areas.…”
Section: Labour Market Earningsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Using the British Household Panel Survey data for 1991-98, Gilbert et al (2003Gilbert et al ( , pp. 1218 observed that "urban wages are significantly higher than remote rural wages, even after adjustments were made for differences in characteristics such as education and industrial structure".…”
Section: The Australian Labour Market Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%