2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low polarised emission from the core of coronal mass ejections

Abstract: Aims. In white-light coronagraph images, cool prominence material is sometimes observed as bright patches in the core of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). If, as generally assumed, this emission is caused by Thomson-scattered light from the solar surface, it should be strongly polarised tangentially to the solar limb. However, the observations of a CME made with the SECCHI/STEREO coronagraphs on 31 August 2007 show that the emission from these bright core patches is exceptionally low polarised. Methods. We used t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter case presents a limit in particular when one wants to visualize the 3D structure of the shock and the front, which are expected to have a significant extension along the LOS, while determination of bright and compact features (like CME cores) should be more precise. Nevertheless, as pointed out by Mierla et al (2011), this is true as long as the Hα emission is not included in the band-pass of the coronagraphs. When this emission is included (as for STEREO coronagraphs) Hα produces a strong spurious emission which, because it is not due to Thomson scattering by free electrons, provides unreliable results when the polarization ratio technique is applied to the prominence plasma often embedded in CME cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter case presents a limit in particular when one wants to visualize the 3D structure of the shock and the front, which are expected to have a significant extension along the LOS, while determination of bright and compact features (like CME cores) should be more precise. Nevertheless, as pointed out by Mierla et al (2011), this is true as long as the Hα emission is not included in the band-pass of the coronagraphs. When this emission is included (as for STEREO coronagraphs) Hα produces a strong spurious emission which, because it is not due to Thomson scattering by free electrons, provides unreliable results when the polarization ratio technique is applied to the prominence plasma often embedded in CME cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As also pointed out by Mierla et al (2011), an equation similar to (1) can be applied when dealing with the polarized components of the white-light, since the polarized emission in COR1 images, integrated along a LOS through the optically thin chromospheric plasma ejected into the corona, is due to the same three contributions. Hence we have that pB = pB Hα + pB Th + pB Th (13) and, in a similar manner to the calculation of the Thomson scattering total brightness tB Th , we can calculate the polarized brightness pB Th as:…”
Section: Estimate Of Hα Polarized Emission From the Blobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are in good agreement for instance with Wiehr & Bianda (2003) and Leroy et al (1984), who measured the linear polarization of Hα radiation from prominences and found it varies within a few percent. Moreover, by the examination of a CME on August 31, 2007, Mierla et al (2011 obtained a Hα contribution to the total brightness emission more than 88% with a very low polarization, less than 5%.…”
Section: Estimate Of Hα Polarized Emission From the Blobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moran et al (2010) have already compared the results of the polarimetric technique with the triangulation technique using STEREO spacecraft observations. In addition, Mierla et al (2011) performed an analysis of the limitations of the polarization technique from an observational point of view. More recently, Dai et al (2014) analysed in detail the ambiguities that arise in the application of this technique and suggested a method for correctly reproducing the CME morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%