2017 22nd IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ets.2017.7968239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low power probabilistic online monitoring of systematic erroneous behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workload size S is determined once the online signal probabilities have converged. The signature window bounds W min , W max may be set to M sp ± 3σ for a 0.3% probability of having a false alarm [7]. However, the signature window can be narrower, which produces a higher error coverage but increases the probability of having false alarms.…”
Section: Proposed Low Cost Error Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The workload size S is determined once the online signal probabilities have converged. The signature window bounds W min , W max may be set to M sp ± 3σ for a 0.3% probability of having a false alarm [7]. However, the signature window can be narrower, which produces a higher error coverage but increases the probability of having false alarms.…”
Section: Proposed Low Cost Error Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal probability monitors Signal probability monitors (SPMs) were recently introduced as a low cost error monitoring technique of the online signal probabilities [7]. Figure 2 presents the concept of online signal probabilities.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation