2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low pressure operated ultrafiltration membrane with integration of hollow mesoporous carbon nanospheres for effective removal of micropollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, studies emphasize that the modification of membranes with composite materials (CNTs, nanofibers, zeolites, etc.,) may be an advantage in water treatment processes, making filtration more effective in removing PhACs and reducing membrane fouling and energy consumption, which are currently the major limitations of the process [13]. This was evidenced by the aforementioned work [47], in which the rejection of tetracycline and 17β-estradiol through a conventional UF nanostructured membrane was studied, concluding that the excellent physicochemical properties of mesoporous hollow carbon nanospheres (MHCNs) and their high surface area contributed to a rejection rate of over 90% with ultrafiltration being able to operate at very low pressure. The achieved rejection rate (94%) competed with that presented by Kimura et al [39] when using polymeric RO membranes (polyamide and cellulose acetate) without any nanosized additive.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Compound Removalmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, studies emphasize that the modification of membranes with composite materials (CNTs, nanofibers, zeolites, etc.,) may be an advantage in water treatment processes, making filtration more effective in removing PhACs and reducing membrane fouling and energy consumption, which are currently the major limitations of the process [13]. This was evidenced by the aforementioned work [47], in which the rejection of tetracycline and 17β-estradiol through a conventional UF nanostructured membrane was studied, concluding that the excellent physicochemical properties of mesoporous hollow carbon nanospheres (MHCNs) and their high surface area contributed to a rejection rate of over 90% with ultrafiltration being able to operate at very low pressure. The achieved rejection rate (94%) competed with that presented by Kimura et al [39] when using polymeric RO membranes (polyamide and cellulose acetate) without any nanosized additive.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Compound Removalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The skin layer structure of the membranes modified with additives and nanosized particles have been improved regarding both permeability and rejection profile, mechanical strength, stiffness, antifouling characteristics of the host polymer, and especially selectivity towards certain compounds [43][44][45][46][47][48]. An increase in water permeability and rejection performance for most of the tested PhACs was achieved due to a higher pore formation efficiency, improved wettability, and a substantial increase in active surface area.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Compound Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, the removal of heavy metal ions and organic molecules from wastewater by adsorptive ultrafiltration MMMs is based on the rejection-adsorption mechanism [ 43 ]. The selective removal of such pollutants by the adsorptive ultrafiltration MMMs is demonstrated in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Adsorptive Ultrafiltration Mmmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the E2 uptake onto TNTs@AC, both TNTs and AC play significant roles in the adsorption. First, E2 molecules have high hydrophobicity, i.e., K owv = 4.01 [5], resulting in E2 that is favorable to attach on the AC surface via the hydrophobic and π−π interactions [12,41]. Second, based on the theoretical calculation of electrostatic potential (ESP) energy, the red sides have the highest ESP value to 61 kcal/mol (Figure 6a), which can be attracted to the negatively charged TNTs via the weak electrostatic attraction.…”
Section: Photoregeneration Of Tnts@acmentioning
confidence: 99%