2011
DOI: 10.1080/00405001003616777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐pressure plasma treatment for hydrophilization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fabrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Untreated PP fibers have smooth surfaces while plasma-treated PP fibers showed rougher surfaces with increased plasma power and treatment times. Plasma-induced roughening was also observed on the PP fiber surfaces in previous studies [3,19,36,37]. The rough surface formed on the fiber surface contributed to the better adhesion of the coated adhesive.…”
Section: Sem Analysissupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Untreated PP fibers have smooth surfaces while plasma-treated PP fibers showed rougher surfaces with increased plasma power and treatment times. Plasma-induced roughening was also observed on the PP fiber surfaces in previous studies [3,19,36,37]. The rough surface formed on the fiber surface contributed to the better adhesion of the coated adhesive.…”
Section: Sem Analysissupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In this way, it may happen that in the limit a sample of antimicrobial wool may present a resistance of 30,000 cycles in comparison with the control in which the minimum resistance can be up to 31,000 cycles. This represents less than 4% of loss of resistance by the action of L ‐Cys under the evaluated conditions meaning that there is no significant loss of resistance of wool, as described elsewhere 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents less than 4% of loss of resistance by the action of L-Cys under the evaluated conditions meaning that there is no significant loss of resistance of wool, as described elsewhere. 22 The surface morphology of the biofunctionalized wool was observed against a control with a scanning electron microscope. Images indicated in Figure 4 clearly show no evidence of surface alteration or damage.…”
Section: Assessment Of Wool Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in search of "greener" technologies, plasma techniques in all variations of gas type, power etc. (Gouveia et al 2011;Lei et al 2011;Lopez-Santos et al 2010;Parvinzadeh et al 2011) seem to be preferred, while enzymatic treatments (Akkaya et al 2011;Donelli et al 2009;Kardas et al 2011) are gaining interest. Furthermore, the attention for functionalization has shifted in the recent years towards localized modifications, such as photo-grafting or immobilization of functional groups and polymers on specific reactive sites of the substrate (Ito et al 2007;Vladkova 2010).…”
Section: An Overview Of Polyester Functionalization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main objectives of the above forms of polyester functionalization include enhancement of its hydrophilicity (Gouveia et al 2011;Sawada et al 2003), wettability (Bessada et al 2011;Huang et al 2009), dyeability (Hossain et al 2009;Kamel et al 2011), electrical conductivity (Jin et al 2006;Mazinani et al 2010), biodegradability (Xing et al 2011), and addition of new functionalities for e.g. substance entrapment and/or controlled release (Boyd et al 1993;Drobota et al 2010;Kaetsu et al 1999).…”
Section: An Overview Of Polyester Functionalization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%