2013 Loughborough Antennas &Amp; Propagation Conference (LAPC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/lapc.2013.6711938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-profile Slot Antenna integrated with a thin polymer non-metallic battery

Abstract: Abstract-In this study, a low-profile slot antenna was designed with the purpose of having the ability to be integrated into the structure of a layered non-metallic polymer battery. Using a set of previous published parameters for the slot antenna, the structure was modified in the CST Microwave Studio package in order to suit the needs of a battery substrate. A second slotted ground plane was attached beneath the antenna. The composite substrate and ground planes replicates the layered structure of a plastic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we observed a reduction in gain to 0.3dB and a reduction in efficiency to -4.8dB. Once again, comparing this to [5] where an efficiency of -7.3dB at 2.6GHz was simulated for a loss tangent of 0.9, a noticeable improvement was achieved. Table I shows a summary of the results obtained from the initial structure of Fig.…”
Section: Integrated Battery-antenna Structuresupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we observed a reduction in gain to 0.3dB and a reduction in efficiency to -4.8dB. Once again, comparing this to [5] where an efficiency of -7.3dB at 2.6GHz was simulated for a loss tangent of 0.9, a noticeable improvement was achieved. Table I shows a summary of the results obtained from the initial structure of Fig.…”
Section: Integrated Battery-antenna Structuresupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The -10dB fractional bandwidth was calculated to be about 28% and the antenna simulated total efficiency was -2.3dB with a gain of 2.8dB. This can be compared to that of [5] where efficiencies of about -2.2dB and gains of about 3.3dB at 2.6GHz were obtained.…”
Section: Integrated Battery-antenna Structurementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, appearing green materials are contemplated to achieve a more aspiring purpose, designated by the integration of biocompatible, biodegradable and cost-reasonable electronics, such as the monitoring or the diagnosis of humans with environmentally benign technologies. Examples of the most common conductive polymers are shown in Tables 1 and 2 [11][12][13][14] and Figure 1. Among the different conducting polymers, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) is one of the most encouraging materials for bioelectronics due to its relatively high conductivity, stability and more importantly its organic nature and good compatibility with bioorganic molecules such as enzymes compared to other CPs.…”
Section: Green Electronic Materials: Conducting Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batteries thus should contain no metallic components, avoiding the standard use of a metallic hermetic enclosure. Therefore, the materials that replace the metallic elements should be sufficiently conductive to preserve the antenna performance [2]. Advances in material science and the novel digital fabrication technologies offer unprecedented options to realize low-profile batteries that are safer, eco-friendly, and can be lighter than a gram as well as thinner than a millimeter.…”
Section: I! Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%