2023
DOI: 10.3390/rs15020304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Rank Constrained Attention-Enhanced Multiple Spatial–Spectral Feature Fusion for Small Sample Hyperspectral Image Classification

Abstract: Hyperspectral images contain rich features in both spectral and spatial domains, which bring opportunities for accurate recognition of similar materials and promote various fine-grained remote sensing applications. Although deep learning models have been extensively investigated in the field of hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) tasks, classification performance is still limited under small sample conditions, and this has been a longstanding problem. The features extracted by complex network structures … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the performance of the HSSF-MLDSVM based hyper-spectral image object classification using HSI has been compared with the other existing feature fusion-based object classification techniques spectral-spatial dependent global learning (SSDGL) [10], central attention network (CAN) [11], convolution neural network -active learning-Markov random field (CNN-Al-MNF) [12], enhanced-multiscale feature-fusion network (EMFFN) [24], 3-dimension self-attention multiscale feature-fusion network (3DSA-MFN) [25], adaptive spectral-spatial feature fusion network (ASSFFN) [26], low-rank attention multiple feature-fusion network (LMAFN) [27], and deep support vector machine (DSVM) [28]. For evaluating the proposed HSSF-MLDSVM and other existing HSI object classification techniques, the Indian Pines dataset has been used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, the performance of the HSSF-MLDSVM based hyper-spectral image object classification using HSI has been compared with the other existing feature fusion-based object classification techniques spectral-spatial dependent global learning (SSDGL) [10], central attention network (CAN) [11], convolution neural network -active learning-Markov random field (CNN-Al-MNF) [12], enhanced-multiscale feature-fusion network (EMFFN) [24], 3-dimension self-attention multiscale feature-fusion network (3DSA-MFN) [25], adaptive spectral-spatial feature fusion network (ASSFFN) [26], low-rank attention multiple feature-fusion network (LMAFN) [27], and deep support vector machine (DSVM) [28]. For evaluating the proposed HSSF-MLDSVM and other existing HSI object classification techniques, the Indian Pines dataset has been used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, small, medium, and large-scale features are spatially captured using PMN. In the end, a hierarchical fusion of features ensures improved high-level semantic features even with insufficient training data [26], [27]…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, PMN is used for capturing small, medium, and large-scale features spatially. Finally, feature are fused in hierarchical manner assuring better high-level semantic features considering limited training samples [25], [26].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Linear transformation is performed to adjust the feature dimensions and increase the nonlinear expressiveness, and another Linear transformation is performed. Finally, the Shape of the resultant tensor is re-substituted to the initial format for subsequent processing [16].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%