2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2017.2716382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Rank Value Function Approximation for Co-Optimization of Battery Storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Now, instead of having two parameters to optimize over, we have 2T parameters, where T could be in the tens or hundreds of time periods (the largest problem we have worked on exhibited over 40,000 time periods (Cheng et al, 2017)).…”
Section: Value Function Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Now, instead of having two parameters to optimize over, we have 2T parameters, where T could be in the tens or hundreds of time periods (the largest problem we have worked on exhibited over 40,000 time periods (Cheng et al, 2017)).…”
Section: Value Function Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works proposed obtaining first the VF of an MDP and, then, approximate it using a low-rank plus sparse decomposition [20]. On a similar note, a low-rank (rank-one) approximation of the VF has been proposed in the context of energy storage [21], [22]. More recently, [23], [24] proposed to approximate the VF via low-rank optimization in a model-based and off-line setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further increase the revenue of BESSs, some research work has considered a battery to provide EA and frequency regulation (FR) services simultaneously [18], since FR is a significant income source for energy storage [19][20][21][22][23]. For FR, BESSs are used to regulate the frequency of the power grid by charging or discharging based on the regulation signals sent by the power grid operator [5,19,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear programming method was used to maximize the potential revenue of electrical energy storage from participation in EA and FR in the day-ahead market [27]. Co-optimizing EA and FR services simultaneously is considered a multitimescale problem, and a dynamic programming approach was proposed to solve the co-optimization problem [19,20]. These two existing works on co-optimizing EA and FR services assumed that the electricity prices, regulation signals, or their distributions were known in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%