1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(97)00151-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-resolution gamma-ray measurements of uranium enrichment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using only this criterium, the count rate will never decrease, although the last incremental addition of sample to the sample container might not contribute to the signal. In such a case, one has reached the so called infinite thickness [11] for the sample under measurement. The infinite thickness depends on the sample matrix and the gamma ray energy and is smaller for lower gamma ray energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using only this criterium, the count rate will never decrease, although the last incremental addition of sample to the sample container might not contribute to the signal. In such a case, one has reached the so called infinite thickness [11] for the sample under measurement. The infinite thickness depends on the sample matrix and the gamma ray energy and is smaller for lower gamma ray energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further compounded by the fact that these weak gammas are low energy, and therefore easy to shield. The intensity of a radiation signal also experiences an exponential decay through an absorbing medium, example, a 186-keV photon from the decay of 235 U has a µ  of approximately 0.33 cm -1 in aluminum, but about 27.49 cm -1 in uranium metal [6,12].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the uranium enrichment for in-field safeguards applications is usually based on non-destructive X-and gamma-ray spectroscopy methods (GRS). HPGe and NaI detectors have traditionally been the detectors of choice for these tasks using a range of well-developed methods implemented in various commercially available software [5][6][7][8]. The underlying concept of these methods is based on the counting statistics premise with the net peak areas representing the quantitative information on the decaying radioisotopes in a sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the enrichment-meter method calibration standards with known enrichment are required to determine the proportionality constant prior to the measurements with unknown samples. Since the enrichment is determined from the net count rate in a single gamma peak, this method is effectively used in safeguards with low resolution detectors, such as NaI [8,9]. However, the necessity of calibration standards limits its possible applications in-field safeguards applications, especially in situations when such standards cannot be provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%