1951
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.81.910
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low States ofLi7in Intermediate Coupling

Abstract: The intermediate-coupling transition of the five lowest levels of Li 7 -Be 7 is discussed. Some analytical emphasis is placed on tie approach from the (jj) coupling extreme with ordinary (nonexchange) interactions, in which case there is a first-order degeneracy which might have helped explain the scarcity of low levels, but second-order perturbations are shown to be too large. The only possibility of obtaining just two isolated low levels with either ordinary or Majorana interactions lies near the (LS) coupli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong admixture would lower the symmetry of the ground doublet and by altering the factor | might increase the magnetic term enough to bring about agreement with the Li 7 -Be 7 difference. Mixtures, in general, are expected to remove the isolation of the ground doublet by complicating the spectrum, 25 but such a special admixture might not-considered as a second-order perturbation it would depress the ground doublet, perhaps more than the next 2 F because there is only one 2 F in the configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strong admixture would lower the symmetry of the ground doublet and by altering the factor | might increase the magnetic term enough to bring about agreement with the Li 7 -Be 7 difference. Mixtures, in general, are expected to remove the isolation of the ground doublet by complicating the spectrum, 25 but such a special admixture might not-considered as a second-order perturbation it would depress the ground doublet, perhaps more than the next 2 F because there is only one 2 F in the configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then have 23 ((l/rXdV/dr^^^^Ea^ (er/Vo) 2 0.9 mc 2 . (25) Thus, with Ed'^lSao-1 mc 2 , JS/= 1.45(7<f* mc 2 , and J2o"=85.5 mc 2 , we have from (4) the expansion contribution to the excitation difference…”
Section: T=6amentioning
confidence: 98%