1998
DOI: 10.1006/spmi.1998.0570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low temperature hole mobility in strained p-Si/Si1−xGex/p-Si selectively doped double heterojunctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a single band effective-mass approximation has been used at T = 0 K by several researchers [1][2][3] for the general investigation of the quasi-two-dimensional hole gas present in the pseudomorphic Si/Si 1−x Ge x system, a multiband effective-mass approximation has to be employed to describe either the 8 or the 8 and 7 valence bands and strain effect has to be included. This approach leads to non-parabolicities because of the band mixing away from k = 0, described by the non-diagonal terms of the Hamiltonian and because of the stress present in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a single band effective-mass approximation has been used at T = 0 K by several researchers [1][2][3] for the general investigation of the quasi-two-dimensional hole gas present in the pseudomorphic Si/Si 1−x Ge x system, a multiband effective-mass approximation has to be employed to describe either the 8 or the 8 and 7 valence bands and strain effect has to be included. This approach leads to non-parabolicities because of the band mixing away from k = 0, described by the non-diagonal terms of the Hamiltonian and because of the stress present in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the second subband becomes populated the values of the mobilities presented in Fig. 8 are the mean mobilities 31 ϭ ͚ (n) N 1D (n) (n) 2 ͓ ͚ (n) N 1D (n) (n) ͔ Ϫ1 , where (n) and N 1D (n) are the mobility and the electron concentration in the nth subband (nϭ1,2). As the concentration increases the mobility increases up to the point where the second subband starts to become populated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was sometime assumed [22][23][24] that an interface is rough, while the other one is flat (1-interface scattering). As an example, under growth with interruption, the bottom interface is rough, while the top one is flat.…”
Section: Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%