2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature thermal evolution of the Azov Massif (Ukrainian Shield–Ukraine) — Implications for interpreting (U–Th)/He and fission track ages from cratons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degassed zircon was dissolved following the procedure of Evans et al (2005) and analysed by ID ICP MS for U and Th at TSW Analytical Ltd in the University of Western Australia (Perth) on an Agilent 7500 mass spectrometer. For more details on analytical procedures, the reader is referred to Evans et al (2005) and Danišík et al (2008).…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degassed zircon was dissolved following the procedure of Evans et al (2005) and analysed by ID ICP MS for U and Th at TSW Analytical Ltd in the University of Western Australia (Perth) on an Agilent 7500 mass spectrometer. For more details on analytical procedures, the reader is referred to Evans et al (2005) and Danišík et al (2008).…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have been jointly applied in numerous studies to better restrict timetemperature (tT) paths. Several datasets, however, most notably from cratonic settings, have highlighted two aspects of low temperature thermochronometry data that require additional examination: some cratonic AHe data are characterized by significant dispersion, and a number of reported cratonic AHe datasets conflict with corresponding AFT dates when using conventional models for apatite He retentivity (e.g., Crowley et al, 2002;Spotila et al, 2004;Hendriks and Redfield, 2005;Hansen and Reiners, 2006;Danisik et al, 2008;Kohn et al, 2009). Cratonic AHe and AFT data have therefore become the focal point of a controversy over the cause(s) of inconsistency between the techniques (e.g., .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have discovered that apatite He ages in some cratons are older than the corresponding fission-track ages due to various causes, such as radiation-enhanced annealing, change in He retention properties, alpha ejection correction, radiation damage, and cooling time [17][18][19][20]. The alpha ejection correction of raw (U-Th)/He ages leads to erroneous high ages with respect to relatively slow-cooling apatite [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alpha ejection correction of raw (U-Th)/He ages leads to erroneous high ages with respect to relatively slow-cooling apatite [20]. The radiation damage accumulation and annealing model proposed by Flowers et al [8] can explain some cases where the apatite He ages are older than the corresponding fission track ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%