2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05052-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature treated polypyrrole coated cotton fabrics for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when the CNT content was 10 wt%, the EMI SE was 34.42 dB, which is higher than that of 50 wt% CNTs, with an EMI SE of 25.07 dB [ 16 ], and could shield 99.96% of electromagnetic energy. When the content of CNTs was 15 wt%, the electromagnetic shielding efficiency was up to 47.1 dB, shielding 99.998% of incident electromagnetic wave, and this was absolutely suitable for commercial applications, which only require 20 dB [ 17 , 28 ]. In the whole frequency range, the shielding efficiency of the prepared 3D-printed samples with the addition of CNTs had exceeded that published in the literature [ 18 ], where the EMI SE of 3D-printed MWCNT/GNP (12 wt%) composites was only 13.4 dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when the CNT content was 10 wt%, the EMI SE was 34.42 dB, which is higher than that of 50 wt% CNTs, with an EMI SE of 25.07 dB [ 16 ], and could shield 99.96% of electromagnetic energy. When the content of CNTs was 15 wt%, the electromagnetic shielding efficiency was up to 47.1 dB, shielding 99.998% of incident electromagnetic wave, and this was absolutely suitable for commercial applications, which only require 20 dB [ 17 , 28 ]. In the whole frequency range, the shielding efficiency of the prepared 3D-printed samples with the addition of CNTs had exceeded that published in the literature [ 18 ], where the EMI SE of 3D-printed MWCNT/GNP (12 wt%) composites was only 13.4 dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because PPy’s excellent adhesion sticks very well to different bearing surfaces, it is the most commonly used polymer to prepare textiles that have electrical conductivity and it may form a composite with insulating fibers or fabric [ 9 ]. Previous studies have reported the use of silk [ 10 ], wool [ 11 ], PES [ 12 ], cotton [ 13 ], and nano cellulose [ 14 ] were used with PPy to form conductive textiles. PTh and its substituents [ 15 16 ] and PANI [ 17 ] can be considered as the other most used polymers to form conductive textiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among diverse exible substrates, cellulose-based cotton fabrics with vertically interwoven warp and weft yarns, generally gained from renewable resources, are desirable candidates because of their low carbon footprint, economic feasibility, exibility, large speci c surface area, and intrinsic biocompatibility. Exploitation of cotton fabrics as substrates has received extensive attention from academic circles due to the intrinsic characteristics above mentioned (Yu et al, 2022;Zou et al, 2023). The fabrics coated with conductive materials, like metal, carbon nanomaterials, and organic conducting polymers, have attracted much attention due to the inherent properties of cotton fabrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fabrics coated with conductive materials, like metal, carbon nanomaterials, and organic conducting polymers, have attracted much attention due to the inherent properties of cotton fabrics. Fabrics modi ed with inorganic materials face the risk of long-term stability because of the weak interactions between coatings and fabrics (Zou et al, 2023). Nano bers have been used as templates to fabricate multifunctional hydrogels and can also promote the accessibility of Cr (VI) adsorption sites (Feng et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2021;Shao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation