2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low velocity impact performance investigation on square hollow glass columns via full-scale experiments and Finite Element analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is also emphasized in Table 3, where the mean experimental ∆ f estimates (i.e., average results grouped by p) are not linearly proportional to p. Based on the dimensions of the panel (1.65 × 2.65 m 2 ), in this context, it can be reasonably expected a frequency increase up to ∆ f = +15%-20% for the occupied structure (under similar ambient conditions). As far as the "added mass ratio" R M is also taken into account, with: (5) in Table 3 it can be also noticed that live loads are generally relevant, hence a further increase of dynamic effects and human perceptions can be expected (see Section 5.3). In terms of damping, see Figure 9c and Table 3, the presence of standing/walking people increased up to two times the capacity of the empty structure (ξ es = 1.15%).…”
Section: Dynamic Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is also emphasized in Table 3, where the mean experimental ∆ f estimates (i.e., average results grouped by p) are not linearly proportional to p. Based on the dimensions of the panel (1.65 × 2.65 m 2 ), in this context, it can be reasonably expected a frequency increase up to ∆ f = +15%-20% for the occupied structure (under similar ambient conditions). As far as the "added mass ratio" R M is also taken into account, with: (5) in Table 3 it can be also noticed that live loads are generally relevant, hence a further increase of dynamic effects and human perceptions can be expected (see Section 5.3). In terms of damping, see Figure 9c and Table 3, the presence of standing/walking people increased up to two times the capacity of the empty structure (ξ es = 1.15%).…”
Section: Dynamic Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the case of glass structures under dynamic/impact loads, or complex systems and glass stairs ( [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], etc.) where-in addition to conventional safety design requirements ( [1,2] and Section 2)-excessive vibrations may involve unfavorable feelings and require dedicated interventions, at the design stage as well as during the service life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4]), blast, explosions and accidental impacts (i.e. [5][6][7][8][9][10]), fire (i.e. [11,12]), hurricanes and climatic loads (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di ering from [18], a standard re curve was considered for loading onto the oven, in accordance with EN regulations (Section 2). rough the experimental study, 3 full-scale beams were investigated.…”
Section: Glass Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special care has been spent also for the analysis and design of glazing systems under extreme loads, such as explosive events [7][8][9], seismic loads [10][11][12][13], natural hazards and climatic loads [14,15], re [16,17], and impacts [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%