2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2821-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower antioxidative capacity of multidrug-resistant cancer cells confers collateral sensitivity to protoflavone derivatives

Abstract: Our results suggest that MDR cancer cells can be more vulnerable to the pro-oxidative activity of protoflavones due to an impaired antioxidative defense that might arise during the adaptation processes provoked by chemotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6A , the total antioxidative capacities of all the tested drug-resistant cell types were lower than their corresponding wild types, which resulted in the accumulation of H 2 O 2 and the much higher oxidative stress in drug-resistant cells than the wild cell types. The lower antioxidative capacity of multidrug-resistant cancer cells has also been reported in a few papers 37 . This result can explain the selective cytotoxicity of spermine and spermidine to drug-resistant cells in media containing FBS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…6A , the total antioxidative capacities of all the tested drug-resistant cell types were lower than their corresponding wild types, which resulted in the accumulation of H 2 O 2 and the much higher oxidative stress in drug-resistant cells than the wild cell types. The lower antioxidative capacity of multidrug-resistant cancer cells has also been reported in a few papers 37 . This result can explain the selective cytotoxicity of spermine and spermidine to drug-resistant cells in media containing FBS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[15] Furthermore, protoapigenone and its 1´-O-butyl-and propargylether, the β-naphthoflavone analog WYC0209, 6-methylprotoflavone and 6-bromoprotoflavone showed selective cytotoxicity against certain MDR cancer cell lines, such as NCI-H460 human non-small cell lung carcinoma cells adapted to doxorubicin, U87 human glioma and DLD1 human colorectal cells, both adapted to paclitaxel. [16] On the other hand, cross-resistance (CR) to protoflavones was observed in C6 rat glioma cells adapted to carmustine, and CS/CR pattern appeared to be in line with altered antioxidative capacity of the MDR cells as compared to their parental cell lines. [16] Based on these results our aim was to systematically explore the cytotoxicity and antitumor potential of further protoflavone derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[16] On the other hand, cross-resistance (CR) to protoflavones was observed in C6 rat glioma cells adapted to carmustine, and CS/CR pattern appeared to be in line with altered antioxidative capacity of the MDR cells as compared to their parental cell lines. [16] Based on these results our aim was to systematically explore the cytotoxicity and antitumor potential of further protoflavone derivatives. In particular, we characterized the anticancer activity of a total of 52 compounds in a diverse panel of cancer cell lines including MDR derivatives expressing ABCB1 or ABCG2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After the initial analysis of cytotoxic activity and potential to induce RONS, we identified two leading compounds ( 5 and 6 ) for further exploration of their mechanisms of action. Since human and rat MDR glioma cell lines possess different antioxidative capacities ( Stankovic et al, 2015 ; Stojkovic et al, 2015 ), we aimed to compare their vulnerability to oxidative stress induced by TrxR1 inhibitors. Therefore, we further assessed their impact on the antioxidative defense system, mitochondrial membrane potential, cell death induction, and cell proliferation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%