2019
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower Body Negative Pressure: Physiological Effects, Applications, and Implementation

Abstract: This review presents lower body negative pressure (LBNP) as a unique tool to investigate the physiology of integrated systemic compensatory responses to altered hemodynamic patterns during conditions of central hypovolemia in humans. An early review published in Physiological Reviews over 40 yr ago (Wolthuis et al. Physiol Rev 54: 566–595, 1974) focused on the use of LBNP as a tool to study effects of central hypovolemia, while more than a decade ago a review appeared that focused on LBNP as a model of hemorrh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
141
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 339 publications
(471 reference statements)
7
141
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LBNP redistributes blood from the upper body to the lower extremities and is an excellent model for inducing hypovolemic circulatory stress, as well as widely used technique for evaluating responses to orthostatic stress and orthostatic tolerance . LBNP induces similar central hypovolemia as the in clinical routine used head‐up tilt test . A major advantage with the LBNP technique is that the subject's body position does not change when generating hypovolemic stress, facilitating hemodynamic monitoring, including measurements of CO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LBNP redistributes blood from the upper body to the lower extremities and is an excellent model for inducing hypovolemic circulatory stress, as well as widely used technique for evaluating responses to orthostatic stress and orthostatic tolerance . LBNP induces similar central hypovolemia as the in clinical routine used head‐up tilt test . A major advantage with the LBNP technique is that the subject's body position does not change when generating hypovolemic stress, facilitating hemodynamic monitoring, including measurements of CO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBNP redistributes blood from the upper body to the lower extremities and is an excellent model for inducing hypovolemic circulatory stress, 19 as well as widely used technique for evaluating responses to orthostatic stress and orthostatic tolerance. 5 [LTI = (ΔP 1 × t 1 ) + (ΔP 2 × t 2 ) + … (ΔP n × t n )], 21 for example, LTI in a subject withstanding LBNP stress test up to 2.5 minutes of LBNP 40mm Hg: (30 × 4) + (10 × 2.5) = 145 Δmm Hg · min.…”
Section: Lower Body Negative Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding eight-hour energy-equivalent frequency-weighted acceleration or A(8) values were 0.76 m/s 2 rms, 1.12 m/s 2 rms, and 1.41 m/s 2 rms, respectively, which were calculated according to the specifications mentioned in ISO 2631-1 [23]. To account for the effects of circadian rhythms and seasonal variations on physiological responses [30], we carried out the four experimental sessions randomly on four different days separated by at least 24 h, approximately at the same time for each subject, between 9.00 am and 4:00 pm during the winter season (November 2018-January 2019).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valid application of the CRM algorithm to critically ill patients requires incorporation of data that represents potential individual confounding variables that could impact tolerance to reduced central blood volume such as that experienced by bleeding trauma patients. Such confounding variables include sex, age, relative anemia and physical fitness as well as hydration and prandial status . In this regard, we strategically included for algorithm development human subjects that represented both sexes across a wide range of age, race, ethnicity and fitness in normal states of hydration and nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%