2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds for the axial three-index assignment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub-problem is the approximate muscle without the layers containing the determined triples. The algorithm that we use here for calculating the lower bound is the Projection method followed by a Hungarian algorithm, which is proposed by Kim et al [22]. All the successors of each candidate are sorted in ascending order according to their lower bounds (line (9)).…”
Section: Beam Search For Ap3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub-problem is the approximate muscle without the layers containing the determined triples. The algorithm that we use here for calculating the lower bound is the Projection method followed by a Hungarian algorithm, which is proposed by Kim et al [22]. All the successors of each candidate are sorted in ascending order according to their lower bounds (line (9)).…”
Section: Beam Search For Ap3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2009) describe new bounding methods for the 3AP. For calculating 3AP lower bounds, they use a projection method followed by a Hungarian algorithm based on a new Lagrangean relaxation.…”
Section: Three‐dimensional Assignment Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His Ph.D. research focused on the development of exact and heuristic solution methods for the Q3AP and the GQAP. Kim successfully developed the new lower bounds for the axial 3-dimensional assignment problem [10] required in the branch-and-bound scheme of solving the Q3AP and designed three heuristic solvers for the Q3AP by adapting stochastic local search techniques [7]. His work on the Q3AP contributed to winning the above mentioned NSF Grant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%