2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.062337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds on the violation of the monogamy inequality for quantum correlation measures

Abstract: In multiparty quantum systems, the monogamy inequality proposes an upper bound on the distribution of bipartite quantum correlation between a single party and each of the remaining parties in the system, in terms of the amount of quantum correlation shared by that party with the rest of the system taken as a whole. However, it is well-known that not all quantum correlation measures universally satisfy the monogamy inequality. In this work, we aim at determining the non-trivial value by which the monogamy inequ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly, this allows us to readily obtain the upper bound of monogamy score, even for quantum correlation measures, such as distillable entanglement and entanglement cost, where the monogamy score is either intractable or not computable. Along with a recent result giving a lower bound [32] on the monogamy score, the present work provides an estimate of the constraints of monogamy in a quantum system. This letter is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, this allows us to readily obtain the upper bound of monogamy score, even for quantum correlation measures, such as distillable entanglement and entanglement cost, where the monogamy score is either intractable or not computable. Along with a recent result giving a lower bound [32] on the monogamy score, the present work provides an estimate of the constraints of monogamy in a quantum system. This letter is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the relation (57) requires that Q(ρ xy ) satisfies the conditions Q(ρ xy ) ≤ S(ρ x ). However, it is independently satisfied by several important quantum correlation measures [75,172].…”
Section: B Information Complementarity: Lower Bound On Monogamy Viola...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we now consider a non-monogamous normalized bipartite quantum corelation measure, Q, which could, for example, be normalized quantum discord or normalized quantum work deficit, we can obtain a useful lower bound on the monogamy score in terms of purity. For an N -qudit state, using (8) and (57), one obtains the relation [172],…”
Section: B Information Complementarity: Lower Bound On Monogamy Violmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we now consider a non-monogamous normalized bipartite quantum corelation measure, Q, which could, for example, be normalized quantum discord or normalized quantum work deficit, we can obtain a useful lower bound on the monogamy score in terms of purity. For an N -qudit state, using (8) and (57), one obtains the relation [172],…”
Section: B Information Complementarity: Lower Bound On Monogamy Violmentioning
confidence: 99%